From 90c5f8988cdee48a66466186c08a700822616bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "codeflash-ai[bot]"
 <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 02:25:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=E2=9A=A1=EF=B8=8F=20Speed=20up=20function=20`s?=
 =?UTF-8?q?orter`=20by=20138,587%=20Here=20is=20an=20optimized=20version?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20of=20your=20`sorter`=20function=20using=20Python's=20built-i?=
 =?UTF-8?q?n=20`sort`=20method,=20which=20is=20much=20faster=20than=20the?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20current=20bubble=20sort=20implementation.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

**Notes:**
- The built-in `sort` method sorts the list in-place with O(n log n) time complexity, compared to O(n²) for bubble sort.
- This preserves the original function signature and output, but greatly improves runtime for large lists.
- All comments are preserved as the relevant portion (‘Sorting list’) describes the sorting action.
---
 code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py b/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
index 9e97f63a0..655840903 100644
--- a/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
+++ b/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
@@ -1,10 +1,5 @@
 def sorter(arr):
     print("codeflash stdout: Sorting list")
-    for i in range(len(arr)):
-        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
-            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
-                temp = arr[j]
-                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
-                arr[j + 1] = temp
+    arr.sort()  # Use Python's built-in Timsort which is much faster than bubble sort
     print(f"result: {arr}")
     return arr