From d691834f0cc96f3f1b952792bd21226184024f02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "codeflash-ai[bot]"
 <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 01:42:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=E2=9A=A1=EF=B8=8F=20Speed=20up=20function=20`s?=
 =?UTF-8?q?orter`=20by=20325,341%=20Certainly!=20The=20given=20program=20u?=
 =?UTF-8?q?ses=20a=20basic=20and=20inefficient=20bubble=20sort=20algorithm?=
 =?UTF-8?q?.=20We=20can=20optimize=20it=20by=20using=20Python=E2=80=99s=20?=
 =?UTF-8?q?built-in=20`sort`=20method=20which=20is=20highly=20optimized.?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20Here's=20the=20rewritten=20code.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This change will leverage Timsort, the algorithm used in Python's built-in sort, which has an average-case time complexity of O(n log n) and is much faster than bubble sort. The output and functionality remain exactly the same.
---
 code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py b/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
index 787cc4a90..f01dd4a14 100644
--- a/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
+++ b/code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
 def sorter(arr):
     print("codeflash stdout: Sorting list")
-    for i in range(len(arr)):
-        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
-            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
-                temp = arr[j]
-                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
-                arr[j + 1] = temp
+
+    # Using the built-in sort method which is more efficient
+    arr.sort()
+
     print(f"result: {arr}")
-    return arr
\ No newline at end of file
+    return arr