Skip to content

Conversation

@misrasaurabh1
Copy link
Contributor

@misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 commented Jul 6, 2025

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Early-skip baseline on insufficient test count

  • Integrate quantity_of_tests_critic in check

  • Update critic signature to support baseline

  • Import OriginalCodeBaseline in critic


Changes diagram

flowchart LR
  A["Baseline result"]
  B["coverage_critic"]
  C["quantity_of_tests_critic"]
  D["Early skip"]
  A -- "evaluate coverage" --> B
  B -- "coverage fails" --> C
  C -- "tests insufficient" --> D
Loading

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
function_optimizer.py
Add tests quantity check to baseline skip                               

codeflash/optimization/function_optimizer.py

  • Added quantity_of_tests_critic to baseline skip condition
  • Combined coverage and test-quantity checks with parentheses
  • +4/-2     
    critic.py
    Support baseline in tests quantity critic                               

    codeflash/result/critic.py

  • Imported OriginalCodeBaseline under TYPE_CHECKING
  • Extended quantity_of_tests_critic signature for baseline
  • +2/-2     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • @github-actions
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2025

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Logic Bug

    The skip condition uses AND between coverage and test quantity checks, preventing early skip when coverage fails but the test count is sufficient. It should likely use OR to skip on either failure.

    if (
        isinstance(original_code_baseline, OriginalCodeBaseline)
        and not coverage_critic(original_code_baseline.coverage_results, self.args.test_framework)
        and not quantity_of_tests_critic(original_code_baseline)
    Missing Runtime Import

    The function signature references OptimizedCandidateResult and OriginalCodeBaseline without runtime imports (they're only under TYPE_CHECKING), causing potential NameError. Import them or use string annotations.

    from codeflash.models.models import CoverageData, OptimizedCandidateResult, OriginalCodeBaseline

    @github-actions
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    Possible issue
    Return failure on insufficient tests

    The early-skip for insufficient tests cleans up resources but doesn’t return,
    allowing execution to continue erroneously. Add a return Failure(...) after cleanup
    so the function exits consistently on both coverage and test-quantity failures.

    codeflash/optimization/function_optimizer.py [901-908]

     if (
         isinstance(original_code_baseline, OriginalCodeBaseline)
         and not coverage_critic(original_code_baseline.coverage_results, self.args.test_framework)
         and not quantity_of_tests_critic(original_code_baseline)
     ):
         if self.args.override_fixtures:
             restore_conftest(original_conftest_content)
         cleanup_paths(paths_to_cleanup)
    +    return Failure("Insufficient number of tests for baseline")
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    __

    Why: The missing return Failure(...) after cleanup lets execution continue erroneously on test-quantity failure, so adding it fixes a critical control-flow bug.

    High
    Fix forward reference type hint

    The runtime annotation references OriginalCodeBaseline which is only imported under
    TYPE_CHECKING, causing a NameError at runtime. Wrap the union in quotes to defer
    evaluation or import the class at runtime.

    codeflash/result/critic.py [53]

    -def quantity_of_tests_critic(candidate_result: OptimizedCandidateResult | OriginalCodeBaseline) -> bool:
    +def quantity_of_tests_critic(candidate_result: "OptimizedCandidateResult | OriginalCodeBaseline") -> bool:
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    __

    Why: The runtime annotation OriginalCodeBaseline isn’t imported outside TYPE_CHECKING, so quoting the union prevents a NameError at function definition.

    Medium

    codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2025
    …arly-skip-if-insufficient-number-of-tests-passed`)
    
    Here is the optimized code (with all comments preserved except for the lines that are modified). The key optimizations are.
    
    1. **Avoid initialize-all-keys upfront:** We only create report keys as needed for `test_result.test_type`, skipping the expensive full loop over `TestType`.
    2. **Combine report data gathering and counting into a single loop:** While collecting report, simultaneously sum pass count and track replay passes—instead of iterating again in `quantity_of_tests_critic`.
    3. **Use local variables and dict.setdefault:** This simplifies branching and dictionary operations.
    4. **Reduce duplicative dictionary lookups** and avoid construction of unused test type results.
    
    
    
    
    **Summary of improvements:**  
    - Removed unnecessary initialization and dictionary work on unneeded types.
    - Only accumulate/report for types/tests actually present (saves iterations/allocations).
    - Inline pass counting and special-case REPLAY_TEST success counting to avoid a second dict walk.
    - All logic and return values of functions are preserved.  
    - Comments are unchanged except for the lines actually optimized.
    @codeflash-ai
    Copy link
    Contributor

    codeflash-ai bot commented Jul 6, 2025

    ⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

    📄 76% (0.76x) speedup for quantity_of_tests_critic in codeflash/result/critic.py

    ⏱️ Runtime : 68.7 microseconds 39.1 microseconds (best of 18 runs)

    I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

    If you approve, it will be merged into this PR (branch early-skip-if-insufficient-number-of-tests-passed).

    @misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 merged commit 2812dd5 into main Jul 6, 2025
    16 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant