⚡️ Speed up function is_repo_a_fork by 14% in PR #572 (fix/is-repo-a-fork)
#573
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #572
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
fix/is-repo-a-fork.📄 14% (0.14x) speedup for
is_repo_a_forkincodeflash/code_utils/env_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
66.0 microseconds→57.8 microseconds(best of77runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here's how you can optimize the provided program for speed.
Optimizations
open()is marginally faster and incurs less overhead than usingPath(...).open().os.environinstead ofos.getenvfor a (very minor) speedup, falling back to{}if not set..getcalls by using exception handling since we expect predictable structure.Here’s the faster version.
Notes:
open.fork.This is the fastest you can make it with the input/output requirements and standard library Python.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr572-2025-07-23T11.56.20and push.