⚡️ Speed up function _compare_hypothesis_tests_semantic by 32% in PR #857 (feat/hypothesis-tests)
          #858
        
          
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #857
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
feat/hypothesis-tests.📄 32% (0.32x) speedup for
_compare_hypothesis_tests_semanticincodeflash/verification/equivalence.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.67 milliseconds→3.53 milliseconds(best of284runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 32% speedup by eliminating redundant data structures and reducing iteration overhead through two key optimizations:
1. Single-pass aggregation instead of list accumulation:
defaultdict(list)to collect allFunctionTestInvocationobjects per test function, then later iterates through these lists to compute failure flags withany(not ex.did_pass for ex in orig_examples)[count, had_failure]to track both example count and failure status in a single pass, eliminating the need to store individual test objects or re-scan them2. Reduced memory allocation and access patterns:
any()operations over these listsThe line profiler shows the key performance gains:
any(not ex.did_pass...)in original (10.1% and 10.2% of total time) are completely eliminatedsetdefault()operations replace the more expensivedefaultdict(list).append()callsBest performance gains occur in test cases with:
test_large_scale_all_fail)test_large_scale_some_failures)any()operations were most expensiveThe optimization maintains identical behavior while dramatically reducing both memory usage and computational complexity from O(examples) to O(1) per test function group.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr857-2025-10-26T20.37.41and push.