From 77be5a5938af394c278bc505c6ce0860e5e119f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "codeflash-ai[bot]"
 <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:57:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?=E2=9A=A1=EF=B8=8F=20Speed=20up=20function=20`s?=
 =?UTF-8?q?orter`=20by=2059,907%=20Certainly!=20The=20provided=20code=20im?=
 =?UTF-8?q?plements=20bubble=20sort,=20which=20is=20inefficient=20(O(N?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=C2=B2)).=20To=20rewrite=20this=20to=20run=20much=20faster=20bu?=
 =?UTF-8?q?t=20keep=20the=20same=20function=20signature=20and=20semantics,?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20we=20can=20use=20Python=E2=80=99s=20built-in=20sort,=20which?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20uses=20Timsort=20(O(N=20log=20N)).=20This=20both=20accelerat?=
 =?UTF-8?q?es=20the=20operation=20and=20preserves=20the=20in-place=20sorti?=
 =?UTF-8?q?ng=20and=20return=20behavior.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Here’s the optimized code.



- **Explanation**: `arr.sort()` sorts the list in-place in O(N log N) time.
- **Semantics**: The original arr is sorted in-place and the sorted list is returned, as before.
- **Comments**: No relevant code comments were present in the original, so none are added.

Let me know if you need to preserve the original sorting algorithm, but for speed, this is optimal.
---
 src/dsa/various.py | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/dsa/various.py b/src/dsa/various.py
index 4356039..74a7bc4 100644
--- a/src/dsa/various.py
+++ b/src/dsa/various.py
@@ -114,3 +114,8 @@ def find_shortest_path(self, start: str, end: str) -> list[str]:
                     queue.append(new_path)
 
         return []  # No path found
+
+
+def sorter(arr):
+    arr.sort()
+    return arr