Merge branch 'codeforpdx:master' into new-header

Author: hermannsalan

src/backend/expungeservice/form_filling_2026.py

@@ -162,9 +162,9 @@ def extra_mappings(self):
             "(phone)": s.phone_number,
 
             # Certificate of mailing
-            "(mailing_date)": "",  # User fills
+            "(mailing_date)": today,
             "(prosecutor_address)": get_da_address(s.county),
-            "(certificate_date)": "",  # User fills
+            "(certificate_date)": today,
             "(defendant_signature_certificate)": "",  # User signs
             "(defendant_name_printed)": s.full_name,
 

src/backend/expungeservice/models/charge_types/traffic_violation.py

@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ class TrafficViolation(ChargeType):
     def type_eligibility(self, disposition):
         if ChargeUtil.dismissed(disposition):
             return TypeEligibility(
-                EligibilityStatus.NEEDS_MORE_ANALYSIS,
-                reason="Dismissed violations are eligible under 137.225(1)(b) but administrative reasons may make this difficult to expunge.",
+                EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE,
+                reason="Always ineligible under 137.225(7)(a) (for convictions) or by omission from statute (for dismissals)",
             )
         elif ChargeUtil.convicted(disposition):
             return TypeEligibility(EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE, reason="Ineligible under 137.225(7)(a)")

src/backend/tests/models/charge_types/test_traffic_offenses.py

@@ -48,10 +48,10 @@ def test_dismissed_violation_is_not_type_eligible():
     )
 
     assert isinstance(charge.charge_type, TrafficViolation)
-    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.NEEDS_MORE_ANALYSIS
+    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE
     assert (
         charge.type_eligibility.reason
-        == "Dismissed violations are eligible under 137.225(1)(b) but administrative reasons may make this difficult to expunge."
+        == "Always ineligible under 137.225(7)(a) (for convictions) or by omission from statute (for dismissals)"
     )
     assert not charge.charge_type.blocks_other_charges
 
@@ -69,10 +69,10 @@ def test_dismissed_infraction_is_not_type_eligible():
     charge = ChargeFactory.create(statute="811135", level="Infraction Class B", disposition=Dispositions.DISMISSED)
 
     assert isinstance(charge.charge_type, TrafficViolation)
-    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.NEEDS_MORE_ANALYSIS
+    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE
     assert (
         charge.type_eligibility.reason
-        == "Dismissed violations are eligible under 137.225(1)(b) but administrative reasons may make this difficult to expunge."
+        == "Always ineligible under 137.225(7)(a) (for convictions) or by omission from statute (for dismissals)"
     )
     assert not charge.charge_type.blocks_other_charges
 
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ def test_old_traffic_statute():
     )
 
     assert isinstance(charge.charge_type, TrafficViolation)
-    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.NEEDS_MORE_ANALYSIS
+    assert charge.type_eligibility.status is EligibilityStatus.INELIGIBLE
     assert (
         charge.type_eligibility.reason
-        == "Dismissed violations are eligible under 137.225(1)(b) but administrative reasons may make this difficult to expunge."
+        == "Always ineligible under 137.225(7)(a) (for convictions) or by omission from statute (for dismissals)"
     )
     assert not charge.charge_type.blocks_other_charges
 

src/backend/tests/test_crawler_expunger.py

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ def test_expunger_with_open_case(record_with_open_case):
     errors = record_with_open_case.errors
     expunger_result = Expunger.run(record_with_open_case)
 
-    assert len(expunger_result) == 2
+    assert len(expunger_result) == 4
     assert "All charges are ineligible because there is one or more open case" in errors[0]