Skip to content

Conversation

@omtekade
Copy link

@omtekade omtekade commented Sep 19, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Internal updates introduce foundational logic to support future functionality. No changes to the user interface, settings, or workflows.
    • No impact on performance, stability, or compatibility.
    • No configuration, migration, or user action required.
    • Testing and behavior of existing features remain unchanged.

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Walkthrough

Introduces a new module t.py with two top-level variable assignments (a = 5, b = 5) and a top-level expression calling sum(a+b).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New module initialization
t.py
Adds variables a = 5, b = 5, and evaluates sum(a+b) at module import time.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nudge a file named t.py to life,
With a and b in tidy strife—both 5.
I hop and add, then sum the sum,
Ears perked high for what may come.
Code crumbs dropped—thump-thump—alive! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Create t.py" is concise, directly matches the primary change (adding a new module t.py with top-level variables and an expression), and clearly communicates the main intent of the changeset to reviewers scanning history. It is specific and avoids vague language or unnecessary detail.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch omtekade-patch-1

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @omtekade, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request adds a new Python script, t.py, to the codebase. The script is a minimal example demonstrating basic variable assignment and a simple arithmetic operation, likely serving as a placeholder or a test file.

Highlights

  • New File Added: A new Python file named t.py has been introduced to the repository.
  • Basic Python Script: The t.py script contains simple Python code that initializes two integer variables, a and b, both set to 5, and then attempts to call the sum() function with their sum.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new Python script, t.py. The script contains a critical error in its use of the sum() function, which will cause a TypeError at runtime. My review provides a correction for this issue to ensure the script runs correctly.

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
a = 5
b = 5
sum(a+b)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The sum() function is being used incorrectly. It expects an iterable (like a list or tuple) as its argument, but a+b evaluates to an integer. This will raise a TypeError at runtime. To calculate and display the sum of a and b, you should use print(a + b) instead.

Suggested change
sum(a+b)
print(a + b)

@omtekade
Copy link
Author

/refacto-test-arvi

@refacto-test
Copy link

refacto-test bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted.

@refacto-test
Copy link

refacto-test bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Python Function Error

📌 Files Processed
  • t.py

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
a = 5
b = 5
sum(a+b)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incorrect sum() Usage

The sum() function expects an iterable as its argument, but is receiving an integer (a+b). This will raise a TypeError when executed since integers are not iterable.

Standards
  • Python Built-in Function Usage
  • Type Compatibility

@omtekade omtekade closed this Sep 19, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
t.py (1)

1-2: Rename file to something meaningful or relocate.

If this is just a scratch/demo, consider placing it under examples/ or tests/ and giving it a descriptive name to avoid polluting the package root.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e184110 and 98539f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • t.py (1 hunks)

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
a = 5
b = 5
sum(a+b)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

sum(a+b) will raise TypeError; compute a + b and avoid top-level execution.

sum expects an iterable; giving it an int raises at import time. Also the bare expression’s value is discarded. Move logic into a function and guard main.

Apply:

 a = 5
 b = 5
-sum(a+b)
+def add(x: int, y: int) -> int:
+    return x + y
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    print(add(a, b))
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
sum(a+b)
a = 5
b = 5
def add(x: int, y: int) -> int:
return x + y
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(add(a, b))
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In t.py around line 3: the statement `sum(a+b)` will raise a TypeError at import
time because sum expects an iterable and this also runs at top level with a
discarded value; change the code to put the logic into a function (e.g., def
add(a, b): return a + b) and call it under a main guard (if __name__ ==
"__main__": ...) so it doesn't execute on import; if you actually intended to
sum multiple values use sum([a, b]) or similar inside the function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant