tar 0.7.0.0

[bergmark]

tar-0.7.0.0 (changelog) (Grandfathered dependencies) is out of bounds for:

• cabal-flatpak-0.1.2 (>=0.5.0.3 && < 0.7). Henning Thielemann stackage@henning-thielemann.de @thielema. Used by: executable
• cabal-install-3.14.1.1 (>=0.5.0.3 && < 0.7). Mikolaj Konarski mikolaj.konarski@funktory.com @Mikolaj, Stackage upper bounds. Used by: library
• hackage-security-0.6.3.1 (>=0.5 && < 0.7). Andreas Abel andreas.abel@gu.se @andreasabel. Used by: library
• keter-2.2.0 (>=0.6.0.0 && < 0.7). Jappie Klooster hi@jappie.me @jappeace. Used by: library
• serialise-0.2.6.1 (>=0.4 && < 0.7). Grandfathered dependencies. Used by: benchmark

[thielema]

On Sat, 6 Sep 2025, Adam Bergmark wrote: [100681?s=20&v=4] bergmark created an issue (commercialhaskell/stackage#7838) tar-0.7.0.0 (changelog) (Grandfathered dependencies) is out of bounds for: * cabal-flatpak-0.1.2 (>=0.5.0.3 && < 0.7). Henning Thielemann ***@***.*** @thielema. Used by: executable

I relaxed version bounds via Hackage-revisions.

[Mikolaj]

Re cabal-install, this bound is not relaxed even on master branch, so it requires a cabal PR that passes CI and then a hopeful retroactive revision for cabal-install 3.14. Maybe you'd want to switch to 3.14.2.0 (less bugs, I think), too and then we'd revise that one?

[Mikolaj]

The cabal -install PR in question is haskell/cabal#11209.

[andreasabel]

PR fixing hackage-security:

• Support tar-0.7 haskell/hackage-security#332

[juhp]

Maybe you'd want to switch to 3.14.2.0

@Mikolaj that will require ghc-9.12.3 (Cabal-3.14.2) presumably

[Mikolaj]

Maybe you'd want to switch to 3.14.2.0

@Mikolaj that will require ghc-9.12.3 (Cabal-3.14.2) presumably

Oh, I see. In that case, shall we revise cabal-install-3.14.1.1 on Hackage?

[juhp]

cabal-install-3.14.2 has been revised (for ghc-9.12.3)

[jappeace]

keter 2.2.1 fixed by release