Consensus Primitive #239
Answered
by
patrick-ogrady
patrick-ogrady
asked this question in
Q&A
-
![]() |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
patrick-ogrady
Dec 12, 2024
Replies: 1 comment
-
Good question! In short, no. commonware-cryptography (which will be released shortly) pairs better with a PBFT-style construction (akin to Tendermint, HotStuff, Simplex, etc.). That being said, future "dialects" of commonware-consensus could implement alternative techniques (there are tradeoffs abound here and I'm not sure there exists a one-size-fits-all). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
patrick-ogrady
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Good question! In short, no.
commonware-cryptography (which will be released shortly) pairs better with a PBFT-style construction (akin to Tendermint, HotStuff, Simplex, etc.).
That being said, future "dialects" of commonware-consensus could implement alternative techniques (there are tradeoffs abound here and I'm not sure there exists a one-size-fits-all).