i440fx vs q35
#7210
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
This is simply due to the downward compatibility of old hardware. Many users have old Dell or Lenovo servers, so there is a high risk that the VMS will not run properly. Q35 may require a little more configuration. It would be more conceivable to offer 2 variants; if one fails, the second variant should be used. But that makes the effort even greater for us If necessary, a note from my own installation, I wanted to use q35 for my Homeassistant OS, no matter what I did, it no longer started properly. (Intel Ultra Processor) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello. I'm curious why this project is using the
i440fx
machine type by default on (the scripts I've looked at so far).According to docs, it does not support a lot of features. There's a larger discussion here about it as well.
RHEL 10 is now also saying that i440fx is deprecated.
--
Am I crazy for thinking this should be the default on VM scripts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions