Skip to content

Commit 0577217

Browse files
committed
Add minutes from 2021-06-16 meeting
1 parent e374fc0 commit 0577217

File tree

1 file changed

+225
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+225
-0
lines changed

src/orga/minutes/2021-06-16.md

Lines changed: 225 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
1+
# 2021-06-16 conda-forge core meeting
2+
3+
****
4+
5+
[Zoom link](https://flatiron.zoom.us/j/93242638216?pwd=bjRCWmVJRW1oTGJhN09VUmxtTTJOUT09)
6+
[What time is the meeting in my time zone](https://arewemeetingyet.com/UTC/2020-08-26/17:00/w/Conda-forge%20dev%20meeting#eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL2hhY2ttZC5pby9wUk15dFVKV1FmU3NJM2xvMGlqQzJRP2VkaXQifQ==)
7+
[last weeks meeting](https://hackmd.io/r5eeo5cGQ7iHG1IgpB6axQ)
8+
9+
10+
## Attendees
11+
* Jannis Leidel (Anaconda/Conda)
12+
* Matt B
13+
14+
## Agenda
15+
16+
### Standing items
17+
18+
* [x] intros for new folks on the call
19+
* MattiP from PyPy
20+
21+
* [x] (CJ) budget
22+
* current approvals?
23+
* Whenever updated numbers land, please screenshare and show the budget.
24+
* Link is in Keybase (numfocus_spreadsheets.txt)
25+
26+
* [x] open votes
27+
28+
29+
#### From previous meeting(s)
30+
31+
- [ ] (JK) OSU OpenPOWER Survey
32+
- have until july 31
33+
- should bump this item to next meeting as a reminder
34+
35+
36+
### Your __new__() agenda items
37+
38+
- [x] (MRB) legal meeting todos
39+
- file-type scanning
40+
- use the linux file command
41+
- add an ok list?
42+
- todos
43+
- [ ] do this on quetz and discuss next time
44+
- increased automation
45+
- staged recipes prob not
46+
- new maintainers maybe?
47+
- add a new add maintainer command to make a PR with CI skip
48+
- better python version testing
49+
- [x] (CHL) response to CVE-2021-29921 (leading zeros being parsed as octal)
50+
- Anaconda received request to patch Python 3.8 for this CVE: https://github.com/ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues/issues/12459
51+
- Rated critical by NVD; CPython decided not to patch due to breaking documented API (leading zeros are expected)
52+
- Ubuntu patched: https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/python3.8/python3.8_3.8.6-1ubuntu0.3/changelog
53+
- open ticket about docs being wrong: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.8/+bug/1931296
54+
- RedHat noted issue, not taken action: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957458
55+
- Consensus is to respect upstream decision to _not_ patch
56+
- todos
57+
- [ ] matt B to send python 3.9.5 PR and try and fix jinja2
58+
- [ ] Anaconda to reach out to CPython devs to ask if they'll reconsider patching 3.8
59+
60+
- [x] (MattiP) PyPy now has a win64 3.7 version, can we roll out feedstocks?
61+
- [ ] wait for https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/pull/1405
62+
- [ ] send a PR to https://github.com/conda-forge/pypy-meta-feedstock
63+
- [ ] send a PR to conda-forge-pinning.
64+
- [x] (jaimergp) Introduce new role at Quansight and community involvement
65+
66+
- [x] (MRB) gpu stuff w/ quantsight updates?
67+
- [ ] (MRB) any CDN outage todo items for conda-forge?
68+
- [ ] TODO: Cheng to set up @anaconda-infrastructure handle (or similar) to bump the right people/teams in Anaconda
69+
70+
71+
### Pushed to next meeting
72+
73+
### Active votes
74+
75+
### Subteam updates
76+
77+
#### Bot
78+
79+
#### ARM
80+
81+
#### POWER
82+
83+
#### CUDA
84+
85+
#### Docs
86+
87+
#### staged-recipes
88+
89+
#### website
90+
91+
#### security+systems
92+
93+
### CI infrastructure
94+
95+
#### Compiler upgrade
96+
97+
### CFEP updates
98+
99+
#### Open PRs
100+
101+
* [cfep-04](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/7) X11 and CDT policy
102+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
103+
* Needs new champion. Thanks for your work on this pkgw! Has unaddressed comments from pkgw as from Jan 10, 2020
104+
Solved: Let's defer and keep the "mixed model" we have now.
105+
106+
* [cfep-06](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/9) Staged-recipes review lifecycle
107+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
108+
* Lingering comment from @saraedum. @jakirkham, can you reply? Has unadressed comment from @saraedum from Jan 8, 2020
109+
* (MRB) The stalebot has solved the worst of the issues here. I think we could defer this one permanently.
110+
Solved: defer in favor of the stale bot for now.
111+
112+
* [cfep-15](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/15) Feedstock statuses, unmaintained
113+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
114+
* Needs another review. Has unaddressed updates from pkgw as of Jan 11, 2020
115+
Pending: re-pinged pkgw for a second review.
116+
117+
* [cfep-12](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/23) Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package
118+
* Stalled since May 26, 2020
119+
* Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel
120+
* Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11
121+
* What were the results of the vote?
122+
* Did we hear back from NumFOCUS? they did the legal seminar which is recorded
123+
124+
* [cfep-17](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/32) Handling pin backports and dependency rebuilds
125+
* Stalled debate about implementation details between Isuru, CJ and Matt
126+
* **UPDATE 2020-07-22**: We in principle have agreement to render the extra pinnings needed directly in the feedstock
127+
on a temporary basis (i.e., until the migration has ended).
128+
129+
* [cfep-19](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/35) Pinning epochs
130+
* Stalled since July
131+
132+
* [cfep-20](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/39) Package split
133+
* No updates for ~1 month
134+
135+
136+
## Discussion
137+
138+
## Check in on previous action items
139+
Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda.
140+
141+
### This meeting
142+
143+
### Last meeting
144+
145+
### 2 meetings ago
146+
147+
### Move to Issue Tracker
148+
2020-11-18
149+
* [ ] (IF/MRB/MV) intel oneAPI
150+
* todo
151+
* [ ] (Nikolay) licensing for opencl_rt
152+
* [ ] (Nikolay) intelmpi ABI compat w/ mpich
153+
* [ ] (MRB/IF) figure out how exactly to package C/C++ compilers
154+
* [ ] (MRB/IF) think about fortran ABI
155+
* [x] (MRB) make conda-forge compilers room (add people including keith)
156+
* [ ] (MB) asking core members to move to "emeritus" status
157+
* [ ] TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus
158+
* Remove emeritus folks from having access to various credentials (api tokens, twitter password, etc.)? This would require a change to the governance doc.
159+
160+
2020-11-11
161+
* TODO: Think about bringing in JOSS to provide context around how we might best write papers
162+
163+
2020-11-03
164+
* TODO: Check on Forrest Watters permissions for core
165+
* [x] (FF) Outreachy would cost 6500 USD.
166+
* Next steps: write abstract and vote on spending of funds.
167+
168+
2020-10-28
169+
2020-10-21
170+
* [ ] (Marius?) Python 2.7 migration
171+
* ( ) [ ] make a hint
172+
* ( ) [ ] make an announcement
173+
* ( ) [ ] make the hint a lint
174+
175+
2020-10-07
176+
* [ ] Make sure to add the NVBug info to the cudatoolkit package that conda-forge makes (if we make one)
177+
178+
2020-09-09
179+
* [ ] (ED) Update governance docs with similar voting model as what got put into conda-tools (+3 with no -1 is a pass)
180+
* [ ] (SC) Write jinja template to turn institutional partners yaml into a website https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/master/src/inst_partners.yaml
181+
* [ ] (SC) Document what needs to be done to create an OVH account and get access
182+
183+
2020-08-26
184+
**Docker hub**
185+
* [ ] (JK) Check in on Azure build workers to see if they have the docker hub limitation.
186+
* [ ] (JK) work with dockerhub to see if we can get OSS status
187+
* [ ] Check in again at some point. We haven't heard back as of 2020-09-23
188+
189+
**OVH**
190+
* [ ] Shout-out on twitter at some point. "Thanks forOVHCloud for providing a VM", etc. (maybe after we ship qt on windows with it?)
191+
192+
193+
* [ ] Figure out how to communicate breaking changes to users. Likely should open up an issue immediately for futher discussion. Ping @kkraus, plus capture notes from further up in these meeting notes
194+
195+
* [ ] John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker
196+
* [ ] Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.)
197+
* [ ] Jonathan will review this [PR](https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/cudatoolkit-feedstock/pull/7)
198+
199+
* [ ] (Kale) schedule conda working group
200+
* [ ] cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback
201+
* [ ] cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward
202+
* [ ] jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot
203+
* [ ] (Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering
204+
* Will try and get this scheduled in the next month.
205+
* [ ] (Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files.
206+
* [ ] (Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in?
207+
* [ ] (Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves?
208+
* [ ] (jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support
209+
* [ ] (jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today
210+
* [ ] (jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks
211+
* [ ] (jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team)
212+
* https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/954
213+
* [ ] (ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like:
214+
* who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure
215+
* who's the POC for the various subteams?
216+
* Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc.
217+
* Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other?
218+
* opt-in to public bios
219+
* software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors
220+
* some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date"
221+
* [ ] (ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge
222+
* [ ] (UK) Static libraries stuff
223+
* [ ] Add linting hints to builds to find them
224+
* [x] Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18
225+
* [x] We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)