|
| 1 | +# 2021-06-16 conda-forge core meeting |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**** |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +[Zoom link](https://flatiron.zoom.us/j/93242638216?pwd=bjRCWmVJRW1oTGJhN09VUmxtTTJOUT09) |
| 6 | +[What time is the meeting in my time zone](https://arewemeetingyet.com/UTC/2020-08-26/17:00/w/Conda-forge%20dev%20meeting#eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL2hhY2ttZC5pby9wUk15dFVKV1FmU3NJM2xvMGlqQzJRP2VkaXQifQ==) |
| 7 | +[last weeks meeting](https://hackmd.io/r5eeo5cGQ7iHG1IgpB6axQ) |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Attendees |
| 11 | +* Jannis Leidel (Anaconda/Conda) |
| 12 | +* Matt B |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## Agenda |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Standing items |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +* [x] intros for new folks on the call |
| 19 | + * MattiP from PyPy |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +* [x] (CJ) budget |
| 22 | + * current approvals? |
| 23 | + * Whenever updated numbers land, please screenshare and show the budget. |
| 24 | + * Link is in Keybase (numfocus_spreadsheets.txt) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +* [x] open votes |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +#### From previous meeting(s) |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +- [ ] (JK) OSU OpenPOWER Survey |
| 32 | + - have until july 31 |
| 33 | + - should bump this item to next meeting as a reminder |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +### Your __new__() agenda items |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- [x] (MRB) legal meeting todos |
| 39 | + - file-type scanning |
| 40 | + - use the linux file command |
| 41 | + - add an ok list? |
| 42 | + - todos |
| 43 | + - [ ] do this on quetz and discuss next time |
| 44 | + - increased automation |
| 45 | + - staged recipes prob not |
| 46 | + - new maintainers maybe? |
| 47 | + - add a new add maintainer command to make a PR with CI skip |
| 48 | + - better python version testing |
| 49 | +- [x] (CHL) response to CVE-2021-29921 (leading zeros being parsed as octal) |
| 50 | + - Anaconda received request to patch Python 3.8 for this CVE: https://github.com/ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues/issues/12459 |
| 51 | + - Rated critical by NVD; CPython decided not to patch due to breaking documented API (leading zeros are expected) |
| 52 | + - Ubuntu patched: https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/python3.8/python3.8_3.8.6-1ubuntu0.3/changelog |
| 53 | + - open ticket about docs being wrong: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.8/+bug/1931296 |
| 54 | + - RedHat noted issue, not taken action: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957458 |
| 55 | + - Consensus is to respect upstream decision to _not_ patch |
| 56 | + - todos |
| 57 | + - [ ] matt B to send python 3.9.5 PR and try and fix jinja2 |
| 58 | + - [ ] Anaconda to reach out to CPython devs to ask if they'll reconsider patching 3.8 |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +- [x] (MattiP) PyPy now has a win64 3.7 version, can we roll out feedstocks? |
| 61 | + - [ ] wait for https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/pull/1405 |
| 62 | + - [ ] send a PR to https://github.com/conda-forge/pypy-meta-feedstock |
| 63 | + - [ ] send a PR to conda-forge-pinning. |
| 64 | +- [x] (jaimergp) Introduce new role at Quansight and community involvement |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +- [x] (MRB) gpu stuff w/ quantsight updates? |
| 67 | +- [ ] (MRB) any CDN outage todo items for conda-forge? |
| 68 | + - [ ] TODO: Cheng to set up @anaconda-infrastructure handle (or similar) to bump the right people/teams in Anaconda |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +### Pushed to next meeting |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +### Active votes |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +### Subteam updates |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +#### Bot |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +#### ARM |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +#### POWER |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +#### CUDA |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +#### Docs |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +#### staged-recipes |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +#### website |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +#### security+systems |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +### CI infrastructure |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +#### Compiler upgrade |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +### CFEP updates |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +#### Open PRs |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +* [cfep-04](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/7) X11 and CDT policy |
| 102 | + * INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status? |
| 103 | + * Needs new champion. Thanks for your work on this pkgw! Has unaddressed comments from pkgw as from Jan 10, 2020 |
| 104 | + Solved: Let's defer and keep the "mixed model" we have now. |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +* [cfep-06](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/9) Staged-recipes review lifecycle |
| 107 | + * INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status? |
| 108 | + * Lingering comment from @saraedum. @jakirkham, can you reply? Has unadressed comment from @saraedum from Jan 8, 2020 |
| 109 | + * (MRB) The stalebot has solved the worst of the issues here. I think we could defer this one permanently. |
| 110 | + Solved: defer in favor of the stale bot for now. |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +* [cfep-15](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/15) Feedstock statuses, unmaintained |
| 113 | + * INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status? |
| 114 | + * Needs another review. Has unaddressed updates from pkgw as of Jan 11, 2020 |
| 115 | + Pending: re-pinged pkgw for a second review. |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +* [cfep-12](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/23) Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package |
| 118 | + * Stalled since May 26, 2020 |
| 119 | + * Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel |
| 120 | + * Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11 |
| 121 | + * What were the results of the vote? |
| 122 | + * Did we hear back from NumFOCUS? they did the legal seminar which is recorded |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +* [cfep-17](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/32) Handling pin backports and dependency rebuilds |
| 125 | + * Stalled debate about implementation details between Isuru, CJ and Matt |
| 126 | + * **UPDATE 2020-07-22**: We in principle have agreement to render the extra pinnings needed directly in the feedstock |
| 127 | + on a temporary basis (i.e., until the migration has ended). |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +* [cfep-19](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/35) Pinning epochs |
| 130 | + * Stalled since July |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +* [cfep-20](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/39) Package split |
| 133 | + * No updates for ~1 month |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +## Discussion |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +## Check in on previous action items |
| 139 | +Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda. |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +### This meeting |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +### Last meeting |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +### 2 meetings ago |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### Move to Issue Tracker |
| 148 | +2020-11-18 |
| 149 | +* [ ] (IF/MRB/MV) intel oneAPI |
| 150 | + * todo |
| 151 | + * [ ] (Nikolay) licensing for opencl_rt |
| 152 | + * [ ] (Nikolay) intelmpi ABI compat w/ mpich |
| 153 | + * [ ] (MRB/IF) figure out how exactly to package C/C++ compilers |
| 154 | + * [ ] (MRB/IF) think about fortran ABI |
| 155 | + * [x] (MRB) make conda-forge compilers room (add people including keith) |
| 156 | +* [ ] (MB) asking core members to move to "emeritus" status |
| 157 | + * [ ] TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus |
| 158 | + * Remove emeritus folks from having access to various credentials (api tokens, twitter password, etc.)? This would require a change to the governance doc. |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +2020-11-11 |
| 161 | +* TODO: Think about bringing in JOSS to provide context around how we might best write papers |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +2020-11-03 |
| 164 | +* TODO: Check on Forrest Watters permissions for core |
| 165 | +* [x] (FF) Outreachy would cost 6500 USD. |
| 166 | + * Next steps: write abstract and vote on spending of funds. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +2020-10-28 |
| 169 | +2020-10-21 |
| 170 | +* [ ] (Marius?) Python 2.7 migration |
| 171 | + * ( ) [ ] make a hint |
| 172 | + * ( ) [ ] make an announcement |
| 173 | + * ( ) [ ] make the hint a lint |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +2020-10-07 |
| 176 | +* [ ] Make sure to add the NVBug info to the cudatoolkit package that conda-forge makes (if we make one) |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +2020-09-09 |
| 179 | +* [ ] (ED) Update governance docs with similar voting model as what got put into conda-tools (+3 with no -1 is a pass) |
| 180 | +* [ ] (SC) Write jinja template to turn institutional partners yaml into a website https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/master/src/inst_partners.yaml |
| 181 | +* [ ] (SC) Document what needs to be done to create an OVH account and get access |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +2020-08-26 |
| 184 | +**Docker hub** |
| 185 | +* [ ] (JK) Check in on Azure build workers to see if they have the docker hub limitation. |
| 186 | +* [ ] (JK) work with dockerhub to see if we can get OSS status |
| 187 | + * [ ] Check in again at some point. We haven't heard back as of 2020-09-23 |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +**OVH** |
| 190 | +* [ ] Shout-out on twitter at some point. "Thanks forOVHCloud for providing a VM", etc. (maybe after we ship qt on windows with it?) |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +* [ ] Figure out how to communicate breaking changes to users. Likely should open up an issue immediately for futher discussion. Ping @kkraus, plus capture notes from further up in these meeting notes |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +* [ ] John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker |
| 196 | +* [ ] Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.) |
| 197 | +* [ ] Jonathan will review this [PR](https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/cudatoolkit-feedstock/pull/7) |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +* [ ] (Kale) schedule conda working group |
| 200 | +* [ ] cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback |
| 201 | +* [ ] cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward |
| 202 | +* [ ] jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot |
| 203 | +* [ ] (Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering |
| 204 | + * Will try and get this scheduled in the next month. |
| 205 | +* [ ] (Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files. |
| 206 | +* [ ] (Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in? |
| 207 | +* [ ] (Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves? |
| 208 | +* [ ] (jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support |
| 209 | +* [ ] (jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today |
| 210 | +* [ ] (jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks |
| 211 | +* [ ] (jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team) |
| 212 | + * https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/954 |
| 213 | +* [ ] (ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like: |
| 214 | + * who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure |
| 215 | + * who's the POC for the various subteams? |
| 216 | + * Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc. |
| 217 | + * Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other? |
| 218 | + * opt-in to public bios |
| 219 | + * software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors |
| 220 | + * some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date" |
| 221 | +* [ ] (ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge |
| 222 | +* [ ] (UK) Static libraries stuff |
| 223 | + * [ ] Add linting hints to builds to find them |
| 224 | + * [x] Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18 |
| 225 | + * [x] We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18 |
0 commit comments