Skip to content

Commit 6f816b5

Browse files
committed
Add meeting notes from 2021-04-07
1 parent 82a22c0 commit 6f816b5

File tree

1 file changed

+196
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+196
-0
lines changed

src/orga/minutes/2021-04-07.md

Lines changed: 196 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
1+
# 2021-04-07 conda-forge core meeting
2+
3+
****
4+
5+
[Zoom link](https://flatiron.zoom.us/j/93242638216?pwd=bjRCWmVJRW1oTGJhN09VUmxtTTJOUT09)
6+
[What time is the meeting in my time zone](https://arewemeetingyet.com/UTC/2020-08-26/17:00/w/Conda-forge%20dev%20meeting#eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL2hhY2ttZC5pby9wUk15dFVKV1FmU3NJM2xvMGlqQzJRP2VkaXQifQ==)
7+
[last weeks meeting](https://hackmd.io/r5eeo5cGQ7iHG1IgpB6axQ)
8+
9+
## Attendees
10+
11+
## Agenda
12+
13+
### Standing items
14+
15+
* [ ] intros for new folks on the call
16+
17+
* [ ] (CJ) budget
18+
* current approvals?
19+
* Whenever updated numbers land, please screenshare and show the budget.
20+
* Link is in Keybase (numfocus_spreadsheets.txt)
21+
22+
23+
#### From previous meeting(s)
24+
25+
26+
27+
### Your __new__() agenda items
28+
29+
[x] (MRB) how do we describe support for languages
30+
- FF define what support means?
31+
- list languages that we have compilers for
32+
- packager of record
33+
- which platforms and chipsets
34+
- versions of languages?
35+
36+
[ ] () Quansight / Nvidia updates?
37+
* no changes (we might get an update on this at the end of this week)
38+
39+
### Pushed to next meeting
40+
41+
### Active votes
42+
43+
### Subteam updates
44+
45+
#### Bot
46+
47+
#### ARM
48+
49+
#### POWER
50+
51+
#### CUDA
52+
53+
#### Docs
54+
55+
#### staged-recipes
56+
57+
#### website
58+
59+
#### security+systems
60+
61+
### CI infrastructure
62+
63+
#### Compiler upgrade
64+
65+
### CFEP updates
66+
67+
#### Open PRs
68+
69+
* [cfep-04](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/7) X11 and CDT policy
70+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
71+
* Needs new champion. Thanks for your work on this pkgw! Has unaddressed comments from pkgw as from Jan 10, 2020
72+
Solved: Let's defer and keep the "mixed model" we have now.
73+
74+
* [cfep-06](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/9) Staged-recipes review lifecycle
75+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
76+
* Lingering comment from @saraedum. @jakirkham, can you reply? Has unadressed comment from @saraedum from Jan 8, 2020
77+
* (MRB) The stalebot has solved the worst of the issues here. I think we could defer this one permanently.
78+
Solved: defer in favor of the stale bot for now.
79+
80+
* [cfep-15](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-enhancement-proposals/pull/15) Feedstock statuses, unmaintained
81+
* INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
82+
* Needs another review. Has unaddressed updates from pkgw as of Jan 11, 2020
83+
Pending: re-pinged pkgw for a second review.
84+
85+
* [cfep-12](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/23) Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package
86+
* Stalled since May 26, 2020
87+
* Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel
88+
* Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11
89+
* What were the results of the vote?
90+
* Did we hear back from NumFOCUS? they did the legal seminar which is recorded
91+
92+
* [cfep-17](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/32) Handling pin backports and dependency rebuilds
93+
* Stalled debate about implementation details between Isuru, CJ and Matt
94+
* **UPDATE 2020-07-22**: We in principle have agreement to render the extra pinnings needed directly in the feedstock
95+
on a temporary basis (i.e., until the migration has ended).
96+
97+
* [cfep-19](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/35) Pinning epochs
98+
* Stalled since July
99+
100+
* [cfep-20](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/39) Package split
101+
* No updates for ~1 month
102+
103+
104+
## Discussion
105+
106+
## Check in on previous action items
107+
Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda.
108+
109+
### This meeting
110+
2021-02-10
111+
112+
### Last meeting
113+
2021-01-27
114+
115+
### 2 meetings ago
116+
2021-01-06
117+
118+
### Move to Issue Tracker
119+
2020-11-18
120+
* [ ] (IF/MRB/MV) intel oneAPI
121+
* todo
122+
* [ ] (Nikolay) licensing for opencl_rt
123+
* [ ] (Nikolay) intelmpi ABI compat w/ mpich
124+
* [ ] (MRB/IF) figure out how exactly to package C/C++ compilers
125+
* [ ] (MRB/IF) think about fortran ABI
126+
* [x] (MRB) make conda-forge compilers room (add people including keith)
127+
* [ ] (MB) asking core members to move to "emeritus" status
128+
* [ ] TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus
129+
* Remove emeritus folks from having access to various credentials (api tokens, twitter password, etc.)? This would require a change to the governance doc.
130+
131+
2020-11-11
132+
* TODO: Think about bringing in JOSS to provide context around how we might best write papers
133+
134+
2020-11-03
135+
* TODO: Check on Forrest Watters permissions for core
136+
* [x] (FF) Outreachy would cost 6500 USD.
137+
* Next steps: write abstract and vote on spending of funds.
138+
139+
2020-10-28
140+
2020-10-21
141+
* [ ] (Marius?) Python 2.7 migration
142+
* ( ) [ ] make a hint
143+
* ( ) [ ] make an announcement
144+
* ( ) [ ] make the hint a lint
145+
146+
2020-10-07
147+
* [ ] Make sure to add the NVBug info to the cudatoolkit package that conda-forge makes (if we make one)
148+
149+
2020-09-09
150+
* [ ] (ED) Update governance docs with similar voting model as what got put into conda-tools (+3 with no -1 is a pass)
151+
* [ ] (SC) Write jinja template to turn institutional partners yaml into a website https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/master/src/inst_partners.yaml
152+
* [ ] (SC) Document what needs to be done to create an OVH account and get access
153+
154+
2020-08-26
155+
**Docker hub**
156+
* [ ] (JK) Check in on Azure build workers to see if they have the docker hub limitation.
157+
* [ ] (JK) work with dockerhub to see if we can get OSS status
158+
* [ ] Check in again at some point. We haven't heard back as of 2020-09-23
159+
160+
**OVH**
161+
* [ ] Shout-out on twitter at some point. "Thanks forOVHCloud for providing a VM", etc. (maybe after we ship qt on windows with it?)
162+
163+
164+
* [ ] Figure out how to communicate breaking changes to users. Likely should open up an issue immediately for futher discussion. Ping @kkraus, plus capture notes from further up in these meeting notes
165+
166+
* [ ] John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker
167+
* [ ] Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.)
168+
* [ ] Jonathan will review this [PR](https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/cudatoolkit-feedstock/pull/7)
169+
170+
* [ ] (Kale) schedule conda working group
171+
* [ ] cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback
172+
* [ ] cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward
173+
* [ ] jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot
174+
* [ ] (Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering
175+
* Will try and get this scheduled in the next month.
176+
* [ ] (Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files.
177+
* [ ] (Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in?
178+
* [ ] (Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves?
179+
* [ ] (jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support
180+
* [ ] (jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today
181+
* [ ] (jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks
182+
* [ ] (jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team)
183+
* https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/954
184+
* [ ] (ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like:
185+
* who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure
186+
* who's the POC for the various subteams?
187+
* Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc.
188+
* Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other?
189+
* opt-in to public bios
190+
* software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors
191+
* some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date"
192+
* [ ] (ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge
193+
* [ ] (UK) Static libraries stuff
194+
* [ ] Add linting hints to builds to find them
195+
* [x] Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18
196+
* [x] We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)