You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
- Will propose an issue on 11.2 to discuss when we are ready to drop it.
59
+
-[x] (JK) CUDA 12.x
60
+
- CUDA 12.0 Migration halfway through most packages, another third in PR.
61
+
- Planning to start adding CUDA 12.x (x > 0) packages
62
+
- Not planning migrations for CUDA 12.x at this time
63
+
- Discussion about whether packages constraints are sufficient
64
+
-[x] (JK) Conda + libmamba
65
+
- This is a month old.
66
+
- These issues have been resolved.
67
+
- (MB) Confirmed resolved.
68
+
-[x] (JK) Public visibility of Alma images on Quay
69
+
- Can't see them on the Quay website. You can pull them.
70
+
- Is there a setting we need to set.
71
+
- This has been fixed by IF
72
+
- Working ex: https://quay.io/repository/condaforge/linux-anvil-cos7-x86_64
73
+
-[x] (HV) Archive k* ecosystem (see last comment [here](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/1861), has five +1's from core)
74
+
- dead as a doornail, constant headache for migrations
75
+
- archiving is reversible, so let's finally bite that bullet?
76
+
- Can leave instructions in feedstock README (or a pinned issue) if someone comes along who wants to revive; however unlikely that is...
77
+
- they have on the order of 1000 downloads. They are real dead, but they constantly show up and block migrations.
78
+
- HV: We should bite the bullet because no one is going to arrive and update these packages.
79
+
- Archiving can be undone easily.
80
+
- FF: we could implement "Packages that need help!"
81
+
- These were archived, not because they are bad, but because they just weren't being maintained.
82
+
- HV: Yes. We can automate this.
83
+
- HV will try, but will ask for support as needed.
84
+
-[x] (HV) [Migration](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/2015) for `error_overlinking: true`?
85
+
- already being set for new feedstocks in staged-recipes, should roll out to existing ones too (eventually).
86
+
- would be a good opportunity to do `{{ stdlib }}`-related changes (e.g. remove implicit run-export to C/C++ stdlib --> must be specified in recipe, `error_overlinking` will find missing instances; if not necessary, package dependencies get slimmed by migration 🥳)
87
+
- JK: Documentation in conda-build is a bit spotty
88
+
-https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/5103
89
+
- MB:
90
+
- Apply to existing feedstocks.
91
+
- Maybe do this incrementally (opt-in like arch-migrator)?
-[x] (HV) [Close](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/issues/5231) boost 1.82 migration and [archive](https://github.com/conda-forge/admin-requests/pull/828) old boost-cpp feedstock
105
+
- YES, DO THIS
106
+
-[x] (DPC) Our next call is Dec 27.
107
+
- Should we cancel?
108
+
- THERE WILL NOT BE A MEETING ON THE 27th.
109
+
-[x] (WV) Do we have any technical debt to take care of? (MRB: LLOL)
110
+
- There is another company that helps with technical debt on open source projects.
111
+
- Is there anything that can be fixed in a reasonalbe amount of time
112
+
- Reasonable: maybe 2-4 weeks.
113
+
- Part of Sovereign Tech Fund. Company in Berlin, with about 10 people.
114
+
- Reach out to Wolf if you have ideas.
43
115
44
116
### Pushed to next meeting
45
117
46
-
-[ ]
118
+
-[ ] (DPC) Google Summer of Code 2024
119
+
- Advice from NumFOCUS for 2024:
120
+
> A key lesson learnt from last year is that Google’s approach to selecting projects is not well suited to umbrella organizations like NumFOCUS. This year, we heavily recommend projects which can apply on their own to do so.
121
+
> We encourage you to explore and propose projects in the AI/ML space. We also expect more potential GSoC contributors to be looking for AI/ML related ideas.
122
+
- From Google
123
+
> We are looking forward to having more AI/ML open source organizations involved in GSoC 2024
124
+
- Is there interest in a conda-forge for GSOC 2024?
125
+
- Is there interest from conda-forge in a conda-wide application?
126
+
- Or would that be an umbrella organization? 🙁
127
+
-[ ] (DPC) Conda-Forge off of twitter now, damn it.
0 commit comments