|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +tags: [meeting-notes] |
| 3 | +title: '2025-05-28' |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | +# conda-forge core meeting 2025-05-28 |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Add new agenda items under the `Your __new__() agenda items` heading |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +- [Zoom link](https://zoom.us/j/9138593505?pwd=SWh3dE1IK05LV01Qa0FJZ1ZpMzJLZz09) |
| 10 | +- [What time is the meeting in my time zone](https://dateful.com/convert/utc?t=5pm) |
| 11 | +- [Previous meetings](https://conda-forge.org/community/minutes/) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## Attendees |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +| Name | Initials | GitHub ID | Affiliation | |
| 16 | +| ----------------------- | -------- | --------------- | --------------------------- | |
| 17 | +| Daniel Ching | DJC | carterbox | NVIDIA/cf | |
| 18 | +| Filipe Fernandes | FF | ocefpaf | conda-forge | |
| 19 | +| John Kirkham | JK | jakirkham | NVIDIA/cf | |
| 20 | +| Jaime Rodríguez-Guerra | JRG | jaimergp | Quansight/cf | |
| 21 | +| Dasha Gurova | DG | dashagurova | Anaconda | |
| 22 | +| | | | | |
| 23 | +| | | | | |
| 24 | +| | | | | |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +X people total |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### Standing items |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +- [ ] |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +### From previous meeting(s) |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +- [ ] |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +### Active votes |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- [ ] |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### Your `__new__()` agenda items |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +- [x] (HV) Drop CUDA 11.8: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/issues/7404 |
| 43 | + - this is currently blocking the CUDA 12.(8,9) [migration](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/pull/7005), which we need for supporting newer architectures like sm_120. |
| 44 | + - Also is getting more painful to maintain (more complex to maintain than other CUDA versions) |
| 45 | + - Seeing fewer user downloads |
| 46 | + - (DJC) Dropping CUDA Toolkit (CTK) 11.8 support from conda-forge is fine by NVIDIA; we'll support CTK 11.8 in our products' feedstocks if we decide we need to extend support |
| 47 | + - Overall consensus to do this, make announcement and execute in 1-2 weeks. |
| 48 | + - (JRG) When doing CUDA Docker images get dropped? |
| 49 | + - (JK) Support is based on associated driver version support |
| 50 | + - https://gitlab.com/nvidia/container-images/cuda/-/issues/177 |
| 51 | +- [x] (HV) Compiler upgrades: GCC 14 & Clang 19: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/pull/7421 |
| 52 | + - Make announcement once remaining PRs are in and tested |
| 53 | +- [x] (HV) Move to VS2022: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/2138 |
| 54 | + - (DJC) We should just try it in some CUDA feedstocks if we're concerned about compatability |
| 55 | + - (DJC) CUDA 11.8 only works with a earlier VS2022 version. It is not compatible with the latest VS2022. For CUDA 12.4+, this is not an issue. Details in https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/2138#issuecomment-2913390542 and following. |
| 56 | + - (HV) Given we are ok dropping CUDA 11.8, we should be ok. |
| 57 | + - (IF) Azure/GitHub Actions still have VS2019, but it is in a different location. |
| 58 | + - Plan is to move forward with VS2022. |
| 59 | + - (HV) Make announcement once ready |
| 60 | +- [x] (HV) Dealing with C++/Fortran modules (https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/2525) -- we probably need to implement `host_exports` (https://github.com/conda/ceps/issues/77) |
| 61 | + - Not a theoretical concern; we're hitting this on some Fortran feedstocks: https://github.com/conda-forge/flang-activation-feedstock/issues/14 |
| 62 | + - Planning to follow up on issue |
| 63 | +- [x] (HV) Follow through on numpy 2 migration closure: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/pull/2522 |
| 64 | + - (JK) Bulk of libraries support NumPy 2 |
| 65 | + - https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/26191 |
| 66 | +- [x] (HV) Pytorch 2.7 [migration](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock/pull/7348) blocked since ~one month due to -- is there a way to debug/fix this, or do we want to migrate without windows? |
| 67 | + - (IF) Is the package on cf-staging that we can copy over? |
| 68 | + - (HV) Need to check whether this could be an option |
| 69 | + - (IF) Other option would be caching on CI and copying over |
| 70 | + - (HV) Think this doesn't work with the GPU builds |
| 71 | + - (JRG) Checking with Amit just to make sure |
| 72 | +- [x] (DJC) Tegra CUDA Toolkit Migration announcement https://github.com/conda-forge/cuda-feedstock/issues/57 |
| 73 | + - (IF) Can we figure out a way of building for SBSA & Tegra in the same build? |
| 74 | + - (DJC) Would be unsupported |
| 75 | + - (IF) We do other custom things to make life easier on our maintainers. Think this would still be valuable |
| 76 | + - (IF) This would also avoid the need for a migrator. |
| 77 | + - (DJC) Would like to do some simple tests to see how packages behave |
| 78 | +- [x] (JRG) Core activity check in https://github.com/conda-forge/governance/issues/1 |
| 79 | +- [x] (JRG) CPython supported releases policy discussion at https://github.com/conda-forge/python-feedstock/issues/794 (prompted by 3.14 rcs coming soon) |
| 80 | + - (JRG) Please comment here |
| 81 | + - (IF) Is this the right place to discuss the matrix? |
| 82 | + - (HV) Useful for discoverability |
| 83 | + - (JK) Important to note we will keep the python package updated to continue to support the matrix. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### Pushed to next meeting |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- [ ] |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +### CFEPs |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +- [ ] |
0 commit comments