-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
Closed
Description
Checklist
- I added a descriptive title
- I searched open requests and couldn't find a duplicate
What is the idea?
The following pull request contains an incomplete implementation of wheel support for rattler:
We want to add proper support for wheel archive files though and that pull request should be seen as a starting point. For this issue, we just want to focus on adding the new ArchiveType support. Adding support for parsing this new repodata format will be handled in a separate issue.
Why is this needed?
This work is being done so that rattler can properly implement the Repodata Wheel Support CEP when/if it is passed.
What should happen?
- Look for all the places where the existing archive file types are referenced (e.g.
tar.bzand.conda) and add a.whlentry - Examine existing tests for these new formats and add new ones where it makes sense
- Update
py-rattlerto account for this new archive type (py-rattler/package_streaming) (add new tests for this there too)
Additional Context
I understand that this conversation is still in flux and the CEP is yet to be formally adopted, so please take all of this with a grain a salt and acknowledge that it may change.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
Type
Projects
Status
Done ๐ช๐พ