Replies: 1 comment
-
| KIP-447 is supported now. The example is not updated though in this client. | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi there, I'm looking at this example of "how to perform a consume-transform-produce loop" - The comment in there states that "Prior to KIP-447 being supported each input partition requires its own transactional producer", but that was 4 years ago, and we're now post KIP-447, right? How would this example look nowadays? We can abstract away from partitions, right?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions