Skip to content

Commit 017f0e7

Browse files
jwakelyjwakely
committed
Set priorities from reflector polls
1 parent eec652a commit 017f0e7

File tree

8 files changed

+66
-8
lines changed

8 files changed

+66
-8
lines changed

‎xml/issue4235.xml‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,12 +8,18 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Hewill Kang</submitter>
1010
<date>25 Mar 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>2</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
1515
Intuitively, both view classes should also have <code>reserve_hint</code> members.
1616
</p>
17+
18+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
19+
<p>
20+
Set priority to 2 after reflector poll.
21+
</p>
22+
1723
</discussion>
1824

1925
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4237.xml‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Hewill Kang</submitter>
1010
<date>27 Mar 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>3</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ specialization provides <code>iterator_category</code>.
5959
This issue is somewhat related to LWG <iref ref="3763"/>, which is a further consideration after LWG
6060
<iref ref="3749"/> has been resolved.
6161
</p>
62+
63+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
64+
<p>
65+
Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
66+
</p>
67+
6268
</discussion>
6369

6470
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4238.xml‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Matthias Kretz</submitter>
1010
<date>27 Mar 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>1</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ basic_simd_mask&lt;<i>integer-from</i>&lt;16&gt;, Abi&gt;&gt;&gt;</tt>
4646
<li><p>delete unary `+`, `-`, and `~` for <tt>basic_simd_mask&lt;16, Abi&gt;</tt>
4747
(closest to the status quo)</p></li>
4848
</ol>
49+
50+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
51+
<p>
52+
Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
53+
</p>
54+
4955
</discussion>
5056

5157
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4240.xml‎

Lines changed: 11 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Hewill Kang</submitter>
1010
<date>06 Apr 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>2</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -115,6 +115,16 @@ of guarantee about <code>formattable</code> can bring unnecessary confusion.
115115
<p>
116116
I think we should ensure that <code>color</code> is <code>formattable</code>, because it is formattable.
117117
</p>
118+
119+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
120+
<p>
121+
Set priority to 2 after reflector poll.
122+
</p>
123+
<p>
124+
"This change would prevent future evolution of the API."
125+
"Maybe `formatter` is not useful and `formattable_with` should always be used."
126+
</p>
127+
118128
</discussion>
119129

120130
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4243.xml‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Hewill Kang</submitter>
1010
<date>12 Apr 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>4</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ where `R` is the return type.
102102
Based on reflector feedback, the revised wording just improves the current state of not supporting
103103
support for `volatile`.
104104
</p>
105+
106+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
107+
<p>
108+
Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
109+
</p>
110+
105111
</discussion>
106112

107113
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4248.xml‎

Lines changed: 10 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
1010
<date>26 Apr 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>1</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ what they are for late customization. This is a bug. They should be consistent.
5757
and this inconsistency was a mistake on my part. The correct thing to do is to change
5858
<tt><i>get-domain-late</i></tt> to treat `schedule_from` as special, not `continues_on`.
5959
</p>
60+
61+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
62+
<p>
63+
Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
64+
</p>
65+
<p>
66+
"Names are a bit misleading but the change looks right."
67+
</p>
68+
6069
</discussion>
6170

6271
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4251.xml‎

Lines changed: 10 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
66
<section><sref ref="[indirect.asgn]"/></section>
77
<submitter>Jonathan Wakely</submitter>
88
<date>01 May 2025</date>
9-
<priority>99</priority>
9+
<priority>1</priority>
1010

1111
<discussion>
1212
<p>
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ we only do a non-throwing transfer when the allocators are equal.
3737
I think we <i>should</i> transfer ownership when POCMA is true,
3838
which would make the noexcept-specifier correct.
3939
</p>
40+
41+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
42+
<p>
43+
Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
44+
</p>
45+
<p>
46+
Similar change needed for `std::polymorphic`.
47+
</p>
48+
4049
</discussion>
4150

4251
<resolution>

‎xml/issue4272.xml‎

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
88
</section>
99
<submitter>Luc Grosheintz</submitter>
1010
<date>02 Jun 2025</date>
11-
<priority>99</priority>
11+
<priority>2</priority>
1212

1313
<discussion>
1414
<p>
@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ Moreover, for rank 0 `layout_stride` can be converted to any
3838
specialization of `layout_left` or `layout_right`; but not to every
3939
specialization of `layout_stride`.
4040
</p>
41+
42+
<note>2025-06-12; Reflector poll</note>
43+
<p>
44+
Set priority to 2 after reflector poll.
45+
</p>
46+
4147
</discussion>
4248

4349
<resolution>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)