Hagenberg Tuesday afternoon: move 4202, 4203, 4204, 4205, 4208, and 4209 to Ready

Author: jwakely

xml/issue4202.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4202" status="New">
+<issue num="4202" status="Ready">
 <title><i><code>enable-sender</code></i> should be a variable template</title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.snd.concepts]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ We should roll back that change.
 Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
 </p>
 
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4203.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4203" status="New">
+<issue num="4203" status="Ready">
 <title>Constraints on <i>`get-state`</i> functions are incorrect</title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.schedule.from]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ so that only forwarding queries are forwarded.
 Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
 </p>
 
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4204.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4204" status="New">
+<issue num="4204" status="Ready">
 <title>specification of <code><i>as-sndr2</i>(Sig)</code> in [exec.let] is incomplete</title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.let]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ I suggest making paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 sub-bullets of paragraph 7.
 Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
 </p>
 
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+<p>Dropped the suggestion to nest p8-10 under p7.</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>
@@ -44,8 +47,7 @@ This wording is relative to <paper num="N5001"/>.
 </p>
 <ol>
 <li>
-Change <sref ref="[exec.let]"/> as indicated,
-and nest paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 below paragraph 7:
+Change <sref ref="[exec.let]"/> as indicated:
 
 <blockquote>
 <p>

xml/issue4205.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4205" status="New">
+<issue num="4205" status="Ready">
 <title>`let_[*].transform_env` is specified in terms of the `let_*` sender itself instead of its child</title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.let]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ We guarantee that it can be used in a structured binding, but not that it
 must work with a size of three."
 </p>
 
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4208.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4208" status="New">
+<issue num="4208" status="Ready">
 <title>Wording needs to ensure that in `connect(sndr, rcvr)` that `rcvr` expression is only evaluated once</title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.connect]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ usage in the `new_sndr` expression is unevaluated, but the second usage in `get_
 I think we need to add an extra sentence at the end of this section saying "Where the expression 
 `rcvr` is only evaluated once." or similar.
 </p>
+
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4209.xml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4209" status="New">
+<issue num="4209" status="Ready">
 <title><tt>default_domain::transform_env</tt> should be returning <tt><i>FWD-ENV</i>(env)</tt></title>
 <section><sref ref="[exec.domain.default]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ to connect a child sender has an associated environment equal to <tt><i>FWD-ENV<
 <p>
 So the correct thing for `default_domain::transform_env` to do is to return <tt><i>FWD-ENV</i>(get_env(rcvr))</tt>.
 </p>
+
+<note>Hagenberg 2025-02-10; move to Ready</note>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>