Set some priorities based on reflector polls

Author: jwakely

xml/issue4078.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[format.functions]"/></section>
 <submitter>Jan Schultke</submitter>
 <date>24 Apr 2024</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>4</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <blockquote><pre>
@@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ which would forbid the output range of the output iterator to overlap ranges of
 A friend of mine has suggested to add a <i>Preconditions</i> to the <i>BasicFormatter</i> requirements 
 instead, dealing with the issue at the root (<tt>f.format(u, fc)</tt>).
 </p>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+<p>
+We should prohibit aliasing, so this is undefined.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4107.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[format.range.fmtmap]"/></section>
 <submitter>Victor Zverovich</submitter>
 <date>18 May 2024</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>3</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ and <tt>tuple</tt>s, and make map be responsible for its own structural formatti
 part of it to other formatters in an arbitrary way. This resolution has been applied to {fmt}'s implementation 
 of range formatting to address <a href="https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/issues/3685">#3685</a>.
 </p>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
+Several votes for NAD (a specialization must provide `set_brackets` etc.),
+and suggestions it's a design change that LEWG should see.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4187.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[template.bitset]"/></section>
 <submitter>Arthur O'Dwyer</submitter>
 <date>21 Dec 2024</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>3</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -43,6 +43,20 @@ both types' copy constructors as simply `constexpr` and `noexcept`; and then if
 we should say so in English prose.</p>
 </li>
 </ol>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+<p>
+"Just const-quality the existing assignment operators."
+"Would need to change the return type (breaking) or use `const_cast` (weird)."
+"And it would be needlessly inconsistent with <code>vector&lt;bool&gt;::reference</code>."
+</p>
+<p>
+"The `swap` part belongs in LWG <iref ref="3638"/>."
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4198.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[exec.schedule.from]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
 <date>03 Feb 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>1</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ except with duplicate types removed.
 </p>
 
 <note>This touches the same text as LWG <iref ref="4203"/>.</note>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4199.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[exec.snd.general]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
 <date>03 Feb 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>1</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ function that does the same as `get_completion_signatures`
 except without the sender transformation.
 Then we can express `get_completion_signatures` in terms of that.
 </p>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4203.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[exec.schedule.from]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
 <date>03 Feb 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>1</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -99,6 +99,12 @@ In addition, it should be applying <i>`FWD-ENV-T`</i> to `Env`
 so that only forwarding queries are forwarded.
 </p>
 
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4205.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[exec.let]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
 <date>04 Feb 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>1</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ Otherwise, it is equal to
 The sender passed to <i>`let-env`</i> here should be the <i>child</i> of `sndr`.
 
 </p>
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+<p>
+"We seem to be missing a guarantee that `auto [_,_,child] = sndr;` works.
+We guarantee that it can be used in a structured binding, but not that it
+must work with a size of three."
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>

xml/issue4206.xml

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[exec.syn]"/></section>
 <submitter>Eric Niebler</submitter>
 <date>04 Feb 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>1</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ template&lt;class Sndr, class Rcvr&gt;
 </code></pre>
 </p>
 
+
+<note>2025-02-07; Reflector poll</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>