File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 1 file changed +16
-1
lines changed
Expand file tree Collapse file tree 1 file changed +16
-1
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change 88</section >
99<submitter >Arthur O'Dwyer</submitter >
1010<date >02 Oct 2025</date >
11- <priority >99 </priority >
11+ <priority >3 </priority >
1212
1313<discussion >
1414<p >
@@ -62,6 +62,21 @@ class <tt><i>simd-iterator</i></tt> and/or remove the "exposition only" from <tt
6262constructor. That makes it clear that the above program is indeed intended to be ambiguous. But IMO
6363we should instead simply make the above program valid.
6464</p >
65+
66+ <note >2025-10-22; Reflector poll.</note >
67+ <p >
68+ Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
69+ </p >
70+ <p >
71+ <tt ><i >simd-iterator</i ></tt > can only be constructed only by <tt >basic_vec</tt >,
72+ and <tt >basic_mask</tt > objects.
73+ </p >
74+ <p >
75+ This is NAD as user cannot rely on standard types not being constructible per
76+ <sref ref =" [member.functions]" /> p2. The example would not be fixed by adding
77+ the <tt >explict</tt > in conforming implementation, and changes in <tt >return</tt >
78+ specification are editorial.
79+ </p >
6580</discussion >
6681
6782<resolution >
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments