Revised P/R without the extra "The implementation shall ensure that" wording

Author: Dani-Hub

xml/issue4288.xml

@@ -16,9 +16,8 @@ Currently, the <i>Constraints:</i> element in <sref ref="[time.clock.system.memb
 `system_clock::rep` imposes a requirement for the implementation, without establishing any condition for user 
 code. Perhaps it's wrong to use a <i>Constraints:</i> element there.
 </p>
-</discussion>
 
-<resolution>
+<superseded>
 <p>
 This wording is relative to <paper num="N5008"/>.
 </p>
@@ -41,6 +40,41 @@ using system_clock::rep = <i>unspecified</i>;
 </blockquote>
 </li>
 
+</ol>
+</superseded>
+
+<note>2025-07-15; Reflector discussion</note>
+<p>
+The discussion revealed a preference to not insert the additional 
+"The implementation shall ensure that", because its not really needed, 
+since this is just a normal implementation requirement that falls out of
+the specification. 
+</p>
+</discussion>
+
+<resolution>
+<p>
+This wording is relative to <paper num="N5008"/>.
+</p>
+
+<ol>
+
+<li><p>Modify <sref ref="[time.clock.system.members]"/> as indicated:</p>
+
+<blockquote>
+<pre>
+using system_clock::rep = <i>unspecified</i>;
+</pre>
+<blockquote>
+<p>
+-1- <del><i>Constraints:</i></del> <tt>system_clock::duration::min() &lt; system_clock::duration::zero()</tt> 
+is <tt>true</tt>.
+[<i>Note 1</i>: This implies that `rep` is a signed type. &mdash; <i>end note</i>]
+</p>
+</blockquote>
+</blockquote>
+</li>
+
 </ol>
 </resolution>