diff --git a/xml/issue4397.xml b/xml/issue4397.xml
index d89f1f7e77..0911446c81 100644
--- a/xml/issue4397.xml
+++ b/xml/issue4397.xml
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 <section><sref ref="[span.cons]"/></section>
 <submitter>Hewill Kang</submitter>
 <date>02 Oct 2025</date>
-<priority>99</priority>
+<priority>3</priority>
 
 <discussion>
 <p>
@@ -14,6 +14,19 @@ It is preferable to reject <code>span&lt;int, 42&gt;(views::empty&lt;int&gt;)</c
 at compile-time after <paper num="P2280R4"/>, since applying `ranges::size` on those 
 ranges is a constant expression now.
 </p>
+
+<note>2025-10-20; Reflector poll.</note>
+<p>
+Set priority to 3 after reflector poll.
+</p>
+<p>
+The opinions on reflector discussion where split regarding,
+if this should be considered LEWG matter.
+</p>
+<p>
+Question was raised, if <tt>ranges::size(r) == N</tt> is required
+to be usable at compile-time for integer-class types.
+</p>
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>
diff --git a/xml/issue4404.xml b/xml/issue4404.xml
index a67e214910..54628b17a7 100644
--- a/xml/issue4404.xml
+++ b/xml/issue4404.xml
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
 <!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">
 
-<issue num="4404" status="New">
+<issue num="4404" status="Tentatively NAD">
 <title>Should <code>span(R&amp;&amp;)</code> CTAD apply P2280?</title>
 <section>
 <sref ref="[span.deduct]"/>
@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ auto r = std::array&lt;int, N&gt;{} | std::views::as_const; // as_const_view&lt;
 auto s2 = to_span(r);
 static_assert(std::same_as&lt;decltype(s2), std::span&lt;const int, N&gt;&gt;); // <span style="color:red;font-weight:bolder">fire, ok after this PR</span>
 </pre></blockquote>
+
+<note>2025-10-20 Reflector poll. Status changed: NAD &rarr; Tentatively NAD.</note>
+<p>
+This is breaking change, and we need a paper with analysis.
+</p>
 </discussion>
 
 <resolution>