[utilities] Removing redundant wording, constructors and destructors can't be coroutines (since P3533R2), therefore they are always constexpr-suitable and removed wording is not needed.

Author: hanickadot

source/utilities.tex

@@ -809,12 +809,6 @@
 the element-wise operations specified to be called for that operation
 throws an exception.
 
-\pnum
-The defaulted move and copy constructor, respectively, of \tcode{pair}
-is a constexpr function if and only if all required element-wise
-initializations for move and copy, respectively,
-would be constexpr-suitable\iref{dcl.constexpr}.
-
 \pnum
 If \tcode{(is_trivially_destructible_v<T1> \&\& is_trivially_destructible_v<T2>)}
 is \tcode{true}, then the destructor of \tcode{pair} is trivial.
@@ -1797,14 +1791,6 @@
 For each \tcode{tuple} constructor, an exception is thrown only if the construction of
 one of the types in \tcode{Types} throws an exception.
 
-\pnum
-The defaulted move and copy constructor, respectively, of
-\tcode{tuple} is a constexpr function if and only if all
-required element-wise initializations for move and copy, respectively,
-would be constexpr-suitable\iref{dcl.constexpr}.
-The defaulted move and copy constructor of \tcode{tuple<>} are
-constexpr functions.
-
 \pnum
 If \tcode{is_trivially_destructible_v<$\tcode{T}_i$>} is \tcode{true} for all $\tcode{T}_i$,
 then the destructor of \tcode{tuple} is trivial.
@@ -5773,9 +5759,6 @@
 
 \pnum
 \remarks
-This function is \keyword{constexpr} if and only if the
-value-initialization of the alternative type $\tcode{T}_0$
-would be constexpr-suitable\iref{dcl.constexpr}.
 The exception specification is equivalent to
 \tcode{is_nothrow_default_constructible_v<$\tcode{T}_0$>}.
 \begin{note}