Fixup: Use \exposconcept instead of \exposid

Author: mattkretz

source/numerics.tex

@@ -17003,7 +17003,7 @@
       constexpr basic_simd(R&& range, simd_flags<Flags...> = {});
     template<class R, class... Flags>
       constexpr basic_simd(R&& range, const mask_type& mask, simd_flags<Flags...> = {});
-    template<@\exposid{simd-floating-point}@ V>
+    template<@\exposconcept{simd-floating-point}@ V>
       constexpr explicit(@\seebelow@) basic_simd(const V& reals, const V& imags = {}) noexcept;
 
     // \ref{simd.subscr}, \tcode{basic_simd} subscript operators
@@ -17058,9 +17058,9 @@
     // \ref{simd.complex.access}, \tcode{basic_simd} complex-value accessors
     constexpr auto real() const noexcept;
     constexpr auto imag() const noexcept;
-    template<@\exposid{simd-floating-point}@ V>
+    template<@\exposconcept{simd-floating-point}@ V>
       constexpr void real(const V& v) noexcept;
-    template<@\exposid{simd-floating-point}@ V>
+    template<@\exposconcept{simd-floating-point}@ V>
       constexpr void imag(const V& v) noexcept;
 
     // \ref{simd.cond}, \tcode{basic_simd} exposition only conditional operators