[dcl.type.general] Strike irrelevant footnote

It is odd to state that there is no special rule where none is
expected.  For the reference to C, does C23 even retain the
implicit int rule?

Author: AlisdairM

source/declarations.tex

@@ -1232,13 +1232,6 @@
 \grammarterm{cv-qualifier} shall appear in a complete
 \grammarterm{type-specifier-seq} or a complete
 \grammarterm{decl-specifier-seq}.
-\begin{footnote}
-There is no special
-provision for a \grammarterm{decl-specifier-seq} that
-lacks a \grammarterm{type-specifier} or that has a
-\grammarterm{type-specifier} that only specifies \grammarterm{cv-qualifier}{s}.
-The ``implicit int'' rule of C is no longer supported.
-\end{footnote}
 
 \pnum
 \begin{note}