[sequence.reqmts] P2846 incorrectly applied for assign_range

[BoPersson]

In N5008 the last part of Recommended practice says "should not perform any reallocation", but the proposal said "should not perform more than a single reallocation".

Obviously, if the assigned range is larger than the current capacity, there has to be some reallocation.

[frederick-vs-ja]

I believe the intent is the same. But the current wording looks a bit weird. @cor3ntin What do you think?

[cor3ntin]

The wording from https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p2846r6.pdf seems to have been incorrectly applied for assign_range, so this qualifies as editorial, I think @tkoeppe

[jwakely]

Agreed, I don't see any mention of this in #7698 that would explain it. I think it is accidental.

[tkoeppe]

Yes, agreed, thanks! If someone sends a PR we can merge it, or I'll do it at some point.

[frederick-vs-ja]

@jensmaurer This issue should have been fixed now.

[jwakely]

Fixed by 4b1283b