Skip to content

Conversation

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

The original note was incorrect and removed by #6157. But it turns out that some note would still be helpful. This PR tries to find the right way to describe storage reusing and potential subsequent undefined behavior.

Fixes #6143.

... for potentially-overlapping objects and undefined behavior.

The original note was incorrect and removed. But it turns out that
_some_ note is still helpful. This PR tries to find the right way to
describe storage reusing and potential subsequent undefined behavior.

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]>
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 0451d08 into cplusplus:main Oct 21, 2024
2 checks passed
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the potentially-overlapping-2 branch October 21, 2024 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[specialized.algorithms.general] The note seems incorrect

4 participants