Extend examples for [dcl.spec.auto.general] #7456
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is related to the Issue #7453 proposing multiple changes to clarify the text in [dcl.spec.auto.general]
However, a PR has been created for each specific change.
In [dcl.spec.auto.general]-p5, further examples might be added to cover also p2 and all cases of p4, whereas it currently covers p5, p3, and partially p4.
In this PR no modification applied about having Example 1 as a fully separated part, because after it there is a further sentence for p5. Would it be better as separated part after such sentence ?