P0472R3 Put std::monostate in <utility> #7700
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
I think there should be an index entry. |
Member
Author
An index entry for what specifically? Do you mean that there should be redundant index entries that also point to these declarations in [utility.syn]? Do we normally index the synopsis instead of the place of definition? |
Member
|
We don't, but it's not redundant here because it is a new occurrence of the name in a different place. If the class is declared in two different places, I would expect two index entries. |
eisenwave
force-pushed
the
motions-2025-02-lwg-4
branch
from
563a74d to
67e5510
Compare
Contributor
|
Please make your pull request branches writable in the future :-) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #7663.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1993.
New Wording
Paper Wording