Skip to content

Conversation

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have only reviewed the first commit, not the subsequent regrouping of subclauses.

Everything but \iref uses looks correct.

@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the apply_p2319_prevent_path_presentation_problems branch from 5db10f9 to c18e7a9 Compare June 23, 2025 19:37
@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eisenwave Changes applied --- please re-review

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the apply_p2319_prevent_path_presentation_problems branch 2 times, most recently from 016cbf1 to a298fc7 Compare July 16, 2025 18:57
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the apply_p2319_prevent_path_presentation_problems branch from a298fc7 to b5247d7 Compare July 16, 2025 19:13
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit c25d1e8 into cplusplus:main Jul 16, 2025
2 checks passed
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the apply_p2319_prevent_path_presentation_problems branch July 17, 2025 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2025-06 LWG Motion 30] P2319R5 Prevent path presentation problems P2319 R5 Prevent path presentation problems

3 participants