Skip to content

[meta.reflection.queries]/4.3 Fix syntax in example #8152

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

birbacher
Copy link
Contributor

The parenthesis in the example seem to do the wrong grouping. To fix, remove one set of parens. This brings the example in line with P2996R13 from which this wording originates.

The parenthesis in the example seem to do the wrong grouping. To fix,
remove one set of parens. This brings the example in line with P2996R13
from which this wording originates.
@birbacher birbacher force-pushed the editorial/meta.reflection.queries/4.3/syntax-in-example branch from fe197be to 02098b0 Compare August 15, 2025 08:03
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Aug 15, 2025

You don't need to create a novel justification for this situation: it's simply a misapplication of the paper, which is all we need to know.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 50930e2 into cplusplus:main Aug 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@birbacher birbacher deleted the editorial/meta.reflection.queries/4.3/syntax-in-example branch August 15, 2025 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants