Skip to content

Conversation

EmileSaillard
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@EmileSaillard EmileSaillard requested a review from maylis-j March 28, 2023 07:46
Copy link
Contributor

@maylis-j maylis-j left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mostly corrected some typos, and commented when i thought changes would make the whole review more clear.

Copy link
Member

@nathanpainchaud nathanpainchaud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great review! Just a few fixes for the references and a word.

@nathanpainchaud
Copy link
Member

Since the version reviewed is only available through MedIA and not as an arXiv paper, I think we should not merge this branch right now (at least if we follow the same policy we've had up until now).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants