Skip to content

Commit f0c411d

Browse files
committed
add Avoiding generative AI development tools blog post
1 parent 5c40b55 commit f0c411d

File tree

1 file changed

+91
-0
lines changed
  • content/blog/entries/2025-12-01-avoiding-gen-ai-tools

1 file changed

+91
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 91 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
1+
title: Avoiding generative AI development tools
2+
---
3+
categories:
4+
community
5+
open-source
6+
---
7+
author: TimidRobot
8+
---
9+
series:
10+
---
11+
pub_date: 2025-12-01
12+
---
13+
body:
14+
15+
At this time, the Creative Commons (CC) **Technology team** has concluded that
16+
generative AI development tooling does not pass a cost/benefit analysis *for
17+
contributing to our open source projects*. Until further notice, we will not
18+
accept CC Open Source submissions that include code or content generated with
19+
AI.
20+
21+
22+
## Overhyped
23+
24+
Generative AI productivity claims are often championed (and paid for) by those
25+
who reap a material benefit from adoption of AI tooling. Adoption rates are
26+
inflated by a lack of choice when AI tools are included by default and often
27+
cannot be disabled (EditorDavid, 2025). We’ve observed that arguments for their
28+
adoption too often appeal to a fear of missing out or potential future
29+
benefits.
30+
31+
32+
## Inefficiency and slop
33+
34+
Our current evaluation of generative AI development tooling is that it does not
35+
offer a benefit to our open source projects nor to the user of the AI tooling.
36+
Indeed, "when developers use AI tools, they take 19% longer than without—AI
37+
makes them slower." (METR, 2025). A recent report from MIT NANDA indicates
38+
"that 95% of organizations are getting zero return [from generative AI]."
39+
(Challapally et al., 2025). AI tooling enables the creation of spurious work
40+
for reviewers. For example, see the following comment on an AI slop
41+
submission:
42+
43+
> This code does not call curl. This is not a "POC" of anything than [sic]
44+
> suggesting you did this with an AI and that you do not understand what you're
45+
> doing here.
46+
> <br>Please identify the exact line of curl source code that has the problem
47+
> you say exists.
48+
> <br>(badger, 2025)
49+
50+
51+
## Counterproductive
52+
53+
Especially for our contributors, when we participate in work programs like
54+
Google Summer of Code (GSoC) or Outreachy, AI tools train the wrong skills. We
55+
want contributors who are learning the technologies that underpin our open
56+
source projects.
57+
58+
> I listened to an industry representative say that he wants students to have
59+
> “design thinking and the ability to ask questions” without recognizing that
60+
> the student use of AI tools he advocates will stunt their critical thinking
61+
> skills, making it impossible for them to ask questions and do interesting
62+
> “design thinking.”.
63+
> <br>(Valeries, 2025)
64+
65+
## Responsibility and solidarity
66+
67+
In addition to concerns with how AI development tools might negatively impact
68+
our day-to-day, the Technology team has concerns about how generative AI
69+
technology is created and implemented/deployed. Even if generative AI
70+
development tools were actually helpful, the Technology team would be reluctant
71+
to use tools that were developed in a way that harmed others, that are funded
72+
by deployments/implementations that harm others, and that offer short-term
73+
benefits at an existential cost.
74+
75+
## References
76+
77+
- badger. (2025, September 16). Comment on Stack Buffer Overflow in cURL Cookie
78+
Parsing Leads to RCE. curl.
79+
[https://hackerone.com/reports/3340109#activity-36894924](https://hackerone.com/reports/3340109#activity-36894924)
80+
- Challapally, A., Pease, C., Raskar, R., Chari, P., (2025, July). The GenAI
81+
Divide: STATE OF AI IN BUSINESS 2025. MIT NANDA.
82+
[https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ai_report_2025.pdf](https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ai_report_2025.pdf)
83+
- EditorDavid. (2025, May 31). GitHub Users Angry at the Prospect of AI-Written
84+
Issues From Copilot. Slashdot.
85+
[https://developers.slashdot.org/story/25/06/01/0049240/github-users-angry-at-the-prospect-of-ai-written-issues-from-copilot](https://developers.slashdot.org/story/25/06/01/0049240/github-users-angry-at-the-prospect-of-ai-written-issues-from-copilot)
86+
- METR. (2025, July 10). Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced
87+
Open-Source Developer Productivity. METR.
88+
[https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/](https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/)
89+
- Valeries, Barr. (2025, August 29). Feeling Cranky About AI and CS Education.
90+
Communications of the ACM.
91+
[https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/feeling-cranky-about-ai-and-cs-education/](https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/feeling-cranky-about-ai-and-cs-education/)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)