sample_dpmpp_2m slightly different from paper #48
patrickvonplaten
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Maybe also cc @LuChengTHU does it matter a lot whether the timesteps finish at 0.0 or not? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When debugging the
sample_dpmpp_2m
sampler I noticed that the timesteps that are passed to the model are slightly different from the paper.More precisely, the final timestep in
k-diffusion
is always t=0.0 where as the paper states in Appendix B.1 (see paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.01095.pdf):which means the smallest timestep should not be 0.
Maybe cc @crowsonkb :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions