Skip to content

SECURITY.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
153 lines (101 loc) · 5.28 KB

SECURITY.md

File metadata and controls

153 lines (101 loc) · 5.28 KB
Raw

DAO Governance Security Policy — Movement Ecosystem

This document defines the security, integrity, and operational safeguards for governance activities across the Movement DAO ecosystem, including proposals, voting systems, treasury actions, and cross-ecosystem coordination.

Governance Security Principles

Movement DAO governance is built on the following core principles:

  • Integrity: All governance actions must be verifiable and tamper-resistant
  • Transparency: Proposal lifecycle and execution paths must remain auditable
  • Accountability: Delegates and contributors are responsible for their on-chain actions
  • Resilience: Governance must remain functional under adversarial conditions
  • Capital Safety: Treasury actions require elevated safeguards and review layers

Scope of Governance Security

This policy applies to all Movement governance systems, including:

  • On-chain voting systems (Snapshot / on-chain modules)
  • Treasury allocation and capital deployment proposals
  • Protocol parameter changes
  • Ecosystem grant programs
  • Validator and infrastructure governance decisions
  • Cross-chain or external protocol integrations
  • Delegate and council-based decision frameworks

Proposal Security Standards

All governance proposals must meet baseline security requirements:

1. Clarity & Verifiability

  • Proposal must clearly define intent, execution logic, and expected outcome
  • All parameter changes must be explicitly stated
  • Any smart contract references must be verifiable and deployed prior to vote (when applicable)

2. Impact Classification

Each proposal must be classified as:

  • Low Risk: UI updates, metadata, non-financial changes
  • Medium Risk: Parameter tuning, incentive adjustments
  • High Risk: Treasury movement, protocol upgrades, liquidity changes
  • Critical Risk: Cross-chain bridges, custody, or consensus-related changes

High and Critical proposals require additional review cycles.

Voting Security Model

Movement governance supports multi-layer voting integrity:

  • Delegated voting with traceable delegation history
  • Snapshot-based signaling for off-chain coordination
  • On-chain execution for critical protocol changes
  • Quorum thresholds based on proposal category
  • Time-lock mechanisms for high-impact actions

To reduce manipulation risk:

  • Voting snapshots are immutable once finalized
  • Proposal metadata cannot be modified after activation
  • Duplicate or spam proposals may be rejected via governance review

Treasury Governance Controls

Treasury-related actions require enhanced safeguards:

  • Multi-sig or threshold-based approvals for execution
  • Independent review by governance contributors or councils
  • Spending caps per proposal category
  • Time-delayed execution for large capital movements
  • Public auditability of all treasury flows

No single actor may unilaterally execute high-value treasury operations.

Delegate Security Responsibilities

Delegates are expected to:

  • Vote in alignment with disclosed rationale and ecosystem interest
  • Avoid conflicts of interest or undisclosed financial incentives
  • Disclose affiliations impacting governance decisions
  • Maintain operational security of voting credentials
  • Participate in critical incident governance when required

Repeated malicious or negligent behavior may result in delegation removal.

Vulnerability & Governance Incident Handling

If a governance vulnerability or exploit is discovered:

Reporting Channel

Response Protocol

  • Immediate acknowledgment within 72 hours
  • Risk classification (Low / Medium / High / Critical)
  • Emergency governance session if capital or protocol integrity is at risk
  • Coordinated mitigation plan across core contributors and delegates

Emergency Governance Procedures

In case of critical risk events:

  • Emergency proposal path may be activated
  • Voting windows may be shortened under defined thresholds
  • Temporary safeguards (pause mechanisms or timelocks) may be enabled
  • Post-incident review is mandatory for all emergency actions

All emergency actions must be publicly documented after resolution.

Transparency & Auditability

To ensure long-term trust:

  • All governance proposals are archived permanently
  • Voting records are publicly accessible
  • Treasury movements are traceable on-chain
  • Postmortems are published for critical incidents
  • Governance metrics may be periodically reviewed by independent contributors

Movement Governance Context

Movement operates as a financial infrastructure ecosystem powering payments, stablecoins, and real-world asset systems. Governance security is a core component of ensuring:

  • Capital integrity across global payment rails
  • Safe expansion of cross-border financial products
  • Reliable execution of ecosystem incentives
  • Trustless coordination across decentralized participants

Final Note

Governance security is not static. It evolves alongside the protocol, ecosystem complexity, and real-world financial integrations. Continuous improvement and adversarial thinking are required to maintain a resilient DAO structure.