irqdomain: spmi: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree()

irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.

Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).

Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Author: Jiri Slaby (SUSE)

drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c

@@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for bus %d\n", bus_index);
 
-	bus->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
+	bus->domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(node), &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
 	if (!bus->domain) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;