Commit 755bb9a
ASoC: soc-core.c: Prefer to return dai->driver->name in snd_soc_dai_name_get()
ASoC machine driver can use snd_soc_{of_}get_dlc() (A) to get DAI name
for dlc (snd_soc_dai_link_component). In this function call
dlc->dai_name is parsed via snd_soc_dai_name_get() (B).
(A) int snd_soc_get_dlc(...)
{
...
(B) dlc->dai_name = snd_soc_dai_name_get(dai);
...
}
(B) has a priority to return dai->name as dlc->dai_name. In most cases
card can probe successfully. However it has an issue that ASoC tries to
rebind card. Here is a simplified flow for example:
| a) Card probes successfully at first
| b) One of the component bound to this card is removed for some
| reason the component->dev is released
| c) That component is re-registered
v d) ASoC calls snd_soc_try_rebind_card()
a) points dlc->dai_name to dai->name. b) releases all resource of the
old DAI. c) creates new DAI structure. In result d) can not use
dlc->dai_name to add new created DAI.
So it's reasonable that prefer to return dai->driver->name in
snd_soc_dai_name_get() because dai->driver is a pre-defined global
variable. Also update snd_soc_is_matching_dai() for alignment.
Signed-off-by: Chancel Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>1 parent 1778623 commit 755bb9a
1 file changed
+6
-6
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
283 | 283 | | |
284 | 284 | | |
285 | 285 | | |
286 | | - | |
287 | | - | |
288 | | - | |
289 | 286 | | |
290 | 287 | | |
291 | 288 | | |
292 | 289 | | |
| 290 | + | |
| 291 | + | |
| 292 | + | |
293 | 293 | | |
294 | 294 | | |
295 | 295 | | |
| |||
300 | 300 | | |
301 | 301 | | |
302 | 302 | | |
303 | | - | |
304 | | - | |
305 | | - | |
306 | 303 | | |
307 | 304 | | |
308 | 305 | | |
| 306 | + | |
| 307 | + | |
| 308 | + | |
309 | 309 | | |
310 | 310 | | |
311 | 311 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments