locking/csd-lock: Switch from sched_clock() to ktime_get_mono_fast_ns()

Currently, the CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG code uses sched_clock() to check
for excessive CSD-lock wait times.  This works, but does not guarantee
monotonic timestamps on x86 due to the sched_clock() function's use of
the rdtsc instruction, which does not guarantee ordering.  This means
that, given successive calls to sched_clock(), the second might return
an earlier time than the second, that is, time might seem to go backwards.
This can (and does!) result in false-positive CSD-lock wait complaints
claiming almost 2^64 nanoseconds of delay.

Therefore, switch from sched_clock() to ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(), which
does guarantee monotonic timestamps via the rdtsc_ordered() function,
which as the name implies, does guarantee ordered timestamps, at least
in the absence of calls from NMI handlers, which are not involved in
this code path.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <[email protected]>

Author: paulmckrcu

kernel/smp.c

@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
 		return true;
 	}
 
-	ts2 = sched_clock();
+	ts2 = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 	/* How long since we last checked for a stuck CSD lock.*/
 	ts_delta = ts2 - *ts1;
 	if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns * (*nmessages + 1) *
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static void __csd_lock_wait(call_single_data_t *csd)
 	int bug_id = 0;
 	u64 ts0, ts1;
 
-	ts1 = ts0 = sched_clock();
+	ts1 = ts0 = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 	for (;;) {
 		if (csd_lock_wait_toolong(csd, ts0, &ts1, &bug_id, &nmessages))
 			break;