printk: ringbuffer: Skip non-finalized records in panic

Normally a reader will stop once reaching a non-finalized
record. However, when a panic happens, writers from other CPUs
(or an interrupted context on the panic CPU) may have been
writing a record and were unable to finalize it. The panic CPU
will reserve/commit/finalize its panic records, but these will
be located after the non-finalized records. This results in
panic() not flushing the panic messages.

Extend _prb_read_valid() to skip over non-finalized records if
on the panic CPU.

Fixes: 896fbe2 ("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer")
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>

Author: jogness

kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c

@@ -2099,6 +2099,10 @@ u64 prb_next_reserve_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
  *
  * On failure @seq is updated to a record that is not yet available to the
  * reader, but it will be the next record available to the reader.
+ *
+ * Note: When the current CPU is in panic, this function will skip over any
+ *       non-existent/non-finalized records in order to allow the panic CPU
+ *       to print any and all records that have been finalized.
  */
 static bool _prb_read_valid(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 *seq,
 			    struct printk_record *r, unsigned int *line_count)
@@ -2121,8 +2125,28 @@ static bool _prb_read_valid(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 *seq,
 			(*seq)++;
 
 		} else {
-			/* Non-existent/non-finalized record. Must stop. */
-			return false;
+			/*
+			 * Non-existent/non-finalized record. Must stop.
+			 *
+			 * For panic situations it cannot be expected that
+			 * non-finalized records will become finalized. But
+			 * there may be other finalized records beyond that
+			 * need to be printed for a panic situation. If this
+			 * is the panic CPU, skip this
+			 * non-existent/non-finalized record unless it is
+			 * at or beyond the head, in which case it is not
+			 * possible to continue.
+			 *
+			 * Note that new messages printed on panic CPU are
+			 * finalized when we are here. The only exception
+			 * might be the last message without trailing newline.
+			 * But it would have the sequence number returned
+			 * by "prb_next_reserve_seq() - 1".
+			 */
+			if (this_cpu_in_panic() && ((*seq + 1) < prb_next_reserve_seq(rb)))
+				(*seq)++;
+			else
+				return false;
 		}
 	}