KVM: arm64: selftest: Don't try to disable AArch64 support

Trying to cut the branch you are sat on is pretty dumb. And so is
trying to disable the instruction set you are executing on.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>

Author: Marc Zyngier

tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c

@@ -129,10 +129,10 @@ static const struct reg_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr0_el1[] = {
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, DIT, 0),
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SEL2, 0),
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, GIC, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 0),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 1),
 	REG_FTR_END,
 };