Re: Calling Steps from Step Definitions #2172
Replies: 2 comments
-
The wiki is still there but was disabled when it got replaced with the docs site. I've made a copy of the underlying git repository here: https://github.com/cucumber/common-wiki You'll want to start looking the state of the repository before all pages were changed to redirect to the docs page. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Also see here: cucumber/cucumber-ruby#1362 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Where can I find a backup of https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Calling-Steps-from-Step-Definitions ?
I am in want of functional abstraction in Gherkin.
Testers are copying multi-step setups across feature files, making them ugly to maintain even using keyword
Background
.Organization prevents them from re-writing Gherkin steps as Java code.
So I implemented a plugin enabling recursive calls, no
GivenStep
[1], noDefine
[4].I'd like to review the arguments made against recursive calls, cited in 2013 by Aslak Hellesoy in https://web.archive.org/web/20240523132930/https://groups.google.com/g/cukes/c/DzE_kGZx94I
Unfortunately, link [2] went away before the archive indexed it in 2021 (https://web.archive.org/web/20210506174624/https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Calling-Steps-from-Step-Definitions).
Does anyone retain a copy of the wiki article?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions