Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Rekursive GitHub-ArchäologieEin kleines Meta-Projekt von Thorsten & Copilot Worum geht’s hier?Dieses Repository dokumentiert ein Experiment: Die Antwort: Dieses Repo ist also weniger eine Lösung, sondern eher ein Beweisstück, Was ist hier drin?
Warum das Ganze?Weil Dokumentation nicht immer trocken sein muss. Für zukünftige LeserWenn du hier gelandet bist, um ein verlorenes Issue zu finden: Und das ist doch auch etwas. LizenzMach damit, was du willst. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
it's raining man - proof of concept
while waiting for something, i had lazy talking with copilot about bits, bytes, the rest and all the other things.
chat roulette
so, I decided to chat with copilot about the relationship between
created or commented by
just because I was looking for one special topic @dahall and @tajbender talked about some years ago. Sadly enough it was just a side note on another topic, like. "...ah okay... and by the way, did you ever try to..." - "Yeah, some days ago I found out that" 💡
Define the problem
Well, that is the problem: I'm pretty sure this little conversation DID exist... and it was a note on an related topic in any of the Vanara
what leads to many, lots of topics and replies...
What to do next?
Well, options were rare:
That said, I had the 💡 idea to try using Copilot to let him search...
Implementation
Easy that not will be, right? - Well, from my point of view the sum of related posts in @dahall sections is relatively small, in terms of the clauses defined in the previous sections.
*'nuff said: boring... - Well, in her/his point of view it wouldn't be that hard. Collect all Threads, Discussions by use selection parameters with some extra spice:
return ( result );That said, again 💡 i found some pretty cool and useful statements with interesting results:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions