Now for the critical step: peer review synthesis.
Your branch: [YOUR_BRANCH_NAME]
Peer branches to review:
[BRANCH_PATH]Claude[BRANCH_PATH]Grok[BRANCH_PATH]
Process:
- Re-read the original requirements from the first message in this thread
- Review both peer codebases thoroughly against those requirements
- Compare their approaches to your own
- Conduct a comparative analysis (strengths, weaknesses, trade-offs, blind spots) across all three implementations
- Decide what to adopt, adapt, or ignore—then implement those changes
Standards:
- Be objective. These are peers you respect; assume their choices were intentional.
- Be rigorous. Don't make changes lightly—justify each one against the original requirements.
- Be thorough. Review structure, logic, edge cases, and style.
Output: Produce a complete handoff prompt for another agent that includes:
- Your branch name
- Summary of original requirements
- Analysis of all three approaches
- Decisions made and rationale
- Final implementation state