|
| 1 | +/- |
| 2 | +Copyright 2026 The Formal Conjectures Authors. |
| 3 | +
|
| 4 | +Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| 5 | +you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| 6 | +You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| 7 | +
|
| 8 | + https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | +Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| 11 | +distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| 12 | +WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| 13 | +See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| 14 | +limitations under the License. |
| 15 | +-/ |
| 16 | +import FormalConjectures.Util.ProblemImports |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +/-! |
| 19 | +# Erdős Problem 1071 |
| 20 | +
|
| 21 | +*References:* |
| 22 | +* [erdosproblems.com/1071](https://www.erdosproblems.com/1071) |
| 23 | +* [Da85] Danzer, L., _Some combinatorial and metric problems in geometry_. |
| 24 | + Intuitive geometry (Siófok, 1985), 167-177. |
| 25 | +-/ |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +open Set Metric EuclideanGeometry Order |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +namespace Erdos1071 |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +/-- Two segments are disjoint if they only intersect at their endpoints (if at all). -/ |
| 32 | +def SegmentsDisjoint (seg1 seg2 : ℝ² × ℝ²) : Prop := |
| 33 | + segment ℝ seg1.1 seg1.2 ∩ segment ℝ seg2.1 seg2.2 ⊆ {seg1.1, seg1.2, seg2.1, seg2.2} |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +/-- Can a finite set of disjoint unit segments in a unit square be maximal? |
| 36 | +Solved affirmatively by [Da85], who gave an explicit construction. -/ |
| 37 | +@[category research solved, AMS 52] |
| 38 | +theorem erdos_1071a : |
| 39 | + answer(True) ↔ ∃ S : Finset (ℝ² × ℝ²), |
| 40 | + (∀ seg ∈ S, dist seg.1 seg.2 = 1 ∧ |
| 41 | + seg.1 0 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ seg.1 1 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ |
| 42 | + seg.2 0 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ seg.2 1 ∈ Icc 0 1) ∧ |
| 43 | + S.toSet.Pairwise SegmentsDisjoint ∧ |
| 44 | + Maximal (fun T : Finset (ℝ² × ℝ²) => |
| 45 | + (∀ seg ∈ T, dist seg.1 seg.2 = 1 ∧ |
| 46 | + seg.1 0 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ seg.1 1 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ |
| 47 | + seg.2 0 ∈ Icc 0 1 ∧ seg.2 1 ∈ Icc 0 1) ∧ |
| 48 | + T.toSet.Pairwise SegmentsDisjoint) S := by |
| 49 | + sorry |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +/-- Is there a region $R$ with a maximal set of disjoint unit line segments that is countably infinite? -/ |
| 52 | +@[category research open, AMS 52] |
| 53 | +theorem erdos_1071b : |
| 54 | + answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ (R : Set ℝ²) (S : Set (ℝ² × ℝ²)), |
| 55 | + S.Countable ∧ S.Infinite ∧ |
| 56 | + Maximal (fun T : Set (ℝ² × ℝ²) => |
| 57 | + (∀ seg ∈ T, dist seg.1 seg.2 = 1 ∧ seg.1 ∈ R ∧ seg.2 ∈ R) ∧ |
| 58 | + T.Pairwise SegmentsDisjoint) S := by |
| 59 | + sorry |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +end Erdos1071 |
0 commit comments