Confusion around OCR (Mistral) as upload method #7599
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @xoChrisCo 👋 Great questions, I can answer them.
Yes, using the "as Text" option is best when you need the full context of the file, and/or cutting-edge parsing of tables, etc. I have some ideas on how to improve file search and potentially benefiting from the same type of pluggable OCR. Will be getting help on this soon.
Sort of. Technically still true, since enabling "Code Interpreter", also now "Search", activates under-the-hood use of "agents." This is why you see it only with these options selected.
Yes. I do want improvements that we're working on soon as some files don't need any OCR as they are text-based. I do apologize for the confusion, as I will make more "under-the-hood" transitions to using Agents so that the menu is more intuitive. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Experimenting with file uploads, I am seeing far better results running Mistral OCR on PDF documents, than when I'm using File Search. Especially for large PDFs or complex PDFs with charts, tables and more.
I see that the documentation says that this feature is currently
only available through an agent capability
. But a bit further down on the same documentation page, it says thatI can only get the 📎 Attach menu to trigger if I enable
Code Interpreter
. If not, it will just directly show the file picker dialogue window.I am a little confused, and, I guess I have three questions:
only available through an agent capability
line outdated documentation?Code Interpreter
is activated? Is this working as intended?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions