Agent permissions disappear from UI after saving #9290
-
What happened?I tried searching for this issue and wasn't finding it, sorry if it already exists and my searching is just terrible. New agent permissions are great, however they disappear the next time I go in to edit them. It does seem like people I share with still have access, I just can't see the permissions in the sharing window anymore. ![]() Version Information[LibreChat v0.8.0-rc3] I am running this in AWS ECS Fargate, and using DocumentDB for the database. Steps to Reproduce
What browsers are you seeing the problem on?Chrome Relevant log outputI actually don't see anything in browser console logs when saving and reopening agent permissions.
I also don't see any server logs during the same time frame even with debugging turned on. ScreenshotsI made a gif here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wgIHXhMTjqBp8yATptPIqVKlGyt20m04/view?usp=sharing Code of Conduct
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
Noting that this could be related to the fix I did to get the migration script running for my DocumentDB (manually created the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I ran the steps, albeit not on AWS ECS Fargate, and not using DocumentDB for the database, and could not reproduce, so I moved to troubleshooting discussion. If you can record a video of the exact actions, it would help to determine what you're experiencing.
Note, saving permissions does not directly affect the agent data and vice versa, so these can be understood as isolated operations that should not affect each other (besides deleting an agent, then all tied permissions should be removed). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This was resolved earlier last week |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I investigated this further and the issue seemed to be caused by the fact the our DocumentDB did not have the 'groups' collections. Creating this resolved the issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I investigated this further and the issue seemed to be caused by the fact the our DocumentDB did not have the 'groups' collections. Creating this resolved the issue.