Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
Thanks! Yes, this is an omission, sorry about that. I was already experimenting with expanding what |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
With the recent changes removing the ability to run builders outside of
testBuilder
, I wonder if there's a way to also test post-process builders?In particular, I have a sequence of builders generating hidden temporary files that a post-process builder marks as deleted (not that relevant for the codegen use-case, but it's better to mark them as deleted when build runner is also used for JS/WASM compilation later).
In my test, I want to simulate a build that runs all my regular builders followed by the post-process builder. I then want to assert that certain files would be marked as deleted.
Could
testBuilders
gain the ability to run post-process builders? Then there could be anassetsDeleted
getter onTestReaderWriter
to inspect that.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions