Candidate loci with insufficient evidence: folate-sensitive fragile sites + NOTCH2NLC #160
hdashnow
started this conversation in
Locus updates and new loci
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I included these (and a handful of other loci) without putting a disease association in the catalog since they appeared in misc. lists of putative pathogenic loci (with Adotto being the latest). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The following loci are present as candidates in https://github.com/broadinstitute/str-analysis/tree/main/str_analysis/variant_catalogs but don't currently have sufficient evidence of a Mendelian disease association. I'm documenting them here with notes from @laurelhiatt for posterity, and so that we can come back to them if new studies are published.
chr10 93702516 93702546 ID=FRA10AC1;MOTIFS=CCA,CCG;STRUC=(CCA)n(CCG)nFolate-sensitive fragile site: Pretty sparse evidence imo, the repeat is implicated in a 2004 and since then it has been nonsense variants associated with phenotypes
chr11 66744819 66744843 ID=C11ORF80;MOTIFS=GGC;STRUC=(GGC)nfolate-sensitive fragile site: similar to above; sparse
chrX 149631723 149631780 ID=TMEM185A;MOTIFS=CGCCGT,CGC;STRUC=(CGCCGT)n(CGC)nfolate-sensitive fragile site: similar to above; sparse
chr1 146228800 146228821 ID=NOTCH2NLA;MOTIFS=GCC;STRUC=(GCC)nrelated to NOTCH2NLC chr1:149390803-149390842, not finding in the literature
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions