Skip to content

Commit f1e2daa

Browse files
David SumnerDavid Sumner
authored andcommitted
Changed hero title lines
1 parent 9e58d8b commit f1e2daa

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

src/pages/index.js

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ const IndexPage = () => {
7373
id: "02",
7474
label: "STRATEGIC VENDOR SELECTION",
7575
client: "Multi-Office Law Firm (DC · NY · SF)",
76-
title: "Cutting Through Six MSP Proposals to Find the Right Partner for a 40-Person Firm",
77-
challenge: "A 50-person litigation firm operating across three major markets had outgrown its incumbent IT provider, a vendor with deep political ties to firm leadership but a documented security failure and premium pricing that couldn't be justified. The firm needed to evaluate six competing managed service providers, but each proposal used different pricing structures, different SLA definitions, and different assumptions about scope. Comparing them directly was like comparing six different languages.",
76+
title: "Cutting Through MSP Proposals to Find the Right Technology Partner for a Law Firm",
77+
challenge: "A small litigation firm operating across three major markets had outgrown its incumbent IT provider, a vendor with deep political ties to firm leadership but a documented security failure and premium pricing that couldn't be justified. The firm needed to evaluate six competing managed service providers, but each proposal used different pricing structures, different SLA definitions, and different assumptions about scope. Comparing them directly was like comparing six different languages.",
7878
approach: "Built a structured evaluation framework from the ground up: a weighted scoring matrix spanning security posture, unified communications, compliance readiness, service desk coverage, and total cost of ownership. Each vendor's proposal was normalized against the same criteria regardless of how they chose to present it. SOC 2 certifications were independently verified. Risk and cost tradeoffs were modeled visually so firm leadership could see where the gaps were, not just who scored highest, but why. Vendor write-ups were produced for each of the six finalists, and a full transition roadmap with IT recruitment advisory was delivered alongside.",
7979
outcome: "Two vendors emerged as clear finalists, differentiated not just on price but on security maturity and cultural fit for a firm operating in sensitive litigation environments. Leadership had a defensible, documented rationale for their selection, independent of the incumbent relationship. The engagement also surfaced an IT staffing gap the firm hadn't previously scoped, expanding the advisory into recruitment strategy.",
8080
metrics: [
@@ -153,9 +153,9 @@ const IndexPage = () => {
153153
<div className="hero-content">
154154
<div className="hero-badge">FROM DATA TO DECISIONS</div>
155155
<h1 className="hero-title">
156-
<span className="title-line">Organizations Are</span>
157-
<span className="title-line accent">Information-Rich.</span>
158-
<span className="title-line">Let's Fix the Gap.</span>
156+
<span className="title-line">Your Data Already</span>
157+
<span className="title-line">Has the Answers.</span>
158+
<span className="title-line accent">Let's Find Them.</span>
159159
</h1>
160160
<p className="hero-description">
161161
25+ years leading technology across global enterprise and public sector: from Oracle's

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)